Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hume's Distinction between Philosophical Anatomy and Painting

Bibliographic Data

ID4798461
AuthorsKate Abramson (Indiana University, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume2
Issue5
Pages680-698
Publication date2007-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00096.x
OpenAlexW1988723685
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited12

Although the implications of Hume's distinction between philosophical 'anatomy' and 'painting' have been the subject of lively scholarly debates, it is a puzzling fact that the details of the distinction itself have largely been a matter of interpretive presumption rather than debate. This would be unproblematic if Hume's views about these 'two species of philosophy' were obvious, or if there were a rich standard interpretation of the distinction that we had little reason to doubt. But a careful review of the literature shows neither to be the case. We are far from scholarly consensus about Hume's vision of philosophical anatomy and painting, and what unity there is rests on extremely unsteady ground and leaves important questions unanswered. In this article, my aim is three-fold: first, to show that the appearance of well-grounded scholarly unity about Hume's distinction is illusory; second, to dispose of those misinterpretations of Hume's distinction that are sufficiently at odds with the text that they can be demonstrated to be false in this context; and third, to explore in sufficient detail the numerous questions one might raise about the content of Hume's distinction so that the stage might at last be properly set for a truly full account of Hume's distinction between philosophical anatomy and painting

Art history · Epistemology · Linguistics · Painting · Presumption · Reflexive pronoun · Subject matter · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical Philosophy and Science · History · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Psychology

  • The Philosophical Progress of Hume's Essays

    Open Access•Margaret Watkins•Philosophical Progress of Hume's…•2019

  • Reconciling the Stoic and the Sceptic

    Matthew D Walker, Matthew Walker•British Journal for the History…•2013

  • Hume’s Regulative Epistemology in the Enquiry

    Open Access•Haitao Qu•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • Adam Smith, Adam Ferguson, and the Reconceptualization of Philosophy in Eighteenth-Century Scotland

    Charles R Smith, Craig Smith•History of Political Economy•2022

  • Hume-Arg Philosophers

    Barry Stroud•Hume-Arg Philosophers•2003

  • Creating the Kingdom of Ends

    Open Access•Christine M Korsgaard•Creating the Kingdom of Ends•1996

  • The Sources of Normativity

    Open Access•Christine M Korsgaard, Onora O’neill et al.•Sources of Normativity•1996

  • Order and Artifice in Hume's Political Philosophy

    Frederick J Whelan•Order and Artifice in Hume's…•2017

  • Is Hume an Internalist

    Charlotte Brown•Journal of the history of…•1988

  • Two Portraits of the Humean Moral Agent

    Open Access•Kate Abramson•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2002

  • The Suasive Art of David Hume

    M A Box•Princeton University Press eBooks•1990

  • Happy to Unite, or Not

    Open Access•Kate Abramson•Philosophy Compass•2006

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,31
Citation span2013 - 2024 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae