Phenomenologists on Perception and Hallucination
Husserl and Merleau-Ponty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4806028 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Søren Overgaard (0000-0002-5465-0055, University of Copenhagen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy Compass (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1747-9991 • E-ISSN: 1747-9991 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/phc3.12861 |
| OpenAlex | W4285596477 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 28 |
There is a chasm in current analytic philosophy of perception between disjunctivists (and naïve realists), on the one hand, and 'conjunctivists' (intentionalists), on the other. For more than a decade, scholars of phenomenology have debated how classical phenomenologists such as Husserl and Merleau-Ponty are to be located vis-à-vis this chasm. While there seems to be an emerging consensus that Merleau-Ponty was a disjunctivist avant la lettre, how to interpret Husserl remains contested
Direct and indirect realism · Epistemology · Perception · Phenomenology (philosophy · Psychoanalysis · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis · Philosophy · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |