Cold War Networks and the Scholarly Byt
How Russian Formalism Became an American Thing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4808916 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lidia Tripiccione (Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 949-970 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Slavic Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-6779 • E-ISSN: 2325-7784 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/slr.2024.3 |
| OpenAlex | W4394943075 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
This article centers on one key episode in the reception of Russian formalism in western academia, the 1955 publication of Victor Erlich's acclaimed Russian Formalism. History. Doctrine. The article discusses the appearance of the monograph in the young field of Slavic Studies through novel lenses and conceptualizes the monograph as the result of the activity of a network of heterogeneous actors that contributed to the formation and publication of the book. Methodologically, I develop the concept of the scholarly by hybridizing Boris Eikhenbaum's literaturnyi byt and Bruno Latour's Actor-Network-Theory. Finally, I suggest that the methodological framework developed in the article could be productively applied to further the study of Russian formalism reception
Art · Cold war · Formalism (music · Literature · Political science · Politics · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · History · Law
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |