"Populism as a model of "polarized democracy

Pierre Rosanvallon's theory of populism in contemporary debate

Bibliographic Data

ID4811482
AuthorsDiana Cunha (0000-0002-3549-7059, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco), Paulo Henrique Paschoeto Cassimiro (0000-0003-2986-6580, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro)
Year2022
Volume24
Issue59
Pages200-236
Publication date2022-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociologias (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1517-4522 • E-ISSN: 1807-0337
PublisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/15174522-106783en
OpenAlexW4224232331
SCIELO_PIDS1517-45222022000100200
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited14

This paper examines Pierre Rosanvallon's contribution to understanding populism by adopting two approaches: the first one is the internalist approach, comprising an analysis of his book Le Siècle du populisme (2020) and its comparison with his theory of changes in contemporary democracy (2006-2015). The second approach consists of comparing Le Siècle du populisme with the works of other authors on the subject. The paper is divided into three parts. First, we analyze Le Siècle du populisme, focusing on the two aspects that we consider the most original: the typology of "limit forms of democracy" and its ways of degradation and his critique of populism. In the second part, we contrast this work with his theory of changes in contemporary democracy. In the third part, we contextualize Rosanvallon's work within the literature on populism, exploring the author's idea of populism vis-à-vis democracy. We also compare his interpretation with three of the main contemporary works on the subject: that of Nadia Urbinati involving theory of democracy, and that of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, leading theorists of "leftist populism", targets of Rosanvallon's criticism. Then, we argue that what distinguishes his contribution to populism research is the scope of his theory, able to encompass tensions and complexities in the study of democracy and that offers a way out of the theoretical ambiguities of previous studies on populism

Criticism · Democracy · Democratic Theory · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Populism · Sociology · Subject (documents · Typology · Communism, Protests, Social Movements · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory · Populism, Right-Wing Movements

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access