The Dilemma of "Reasonable Accommodation" in Canada's Multiculturalism

State's Decision to Ban the Niquab at Citizenship Oath Ceremony

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4813338
AutoresShola Agboola (University of Manitoba, autor de correspondencia)
Año2012
Volumen16
Número16
Fecha de publicación2012-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
Revistae-cadernos CES (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1647-0737 • E-ISSN: 1647-0737
EditorialOpenEdition (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4000/eces.1031
OpenAlexW2049858041
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas23

Canada is internationally admired for its commitment to diversity and multiculturalism. However, the recent ban on the wearing of the niquab at Canadian citizenship ceremonies has challenged Canada’s identity as an accommodating multicultural state. The issue is being framed as a dilemma of immigrants’ religious and cultural practices versus the protection of women’s rights. This paper presents three positions on the issue – first, I contend that allowing the niquab at citizenship ceremony does not compromise gender equality; in fact, it may even represent a symbol of empowerment and identity for Muslim women. Second, I draw on the conceptual framework of reasonable accommodation to make a normative argument for accommodating the niquab. Third, I argue that the elitist process by which the state made its decision is democratically illegitimate. In response, I suggest that, regardless of the decision reached, a deliberative democratic process would have met the standards of democratic legitimacy and multiculturalism for which Canadian society is so widely admired and respected

Aesthetics · Ceremony · Citizenship · Democracy · Dilemma · Epistemology · Legitimacy · Multiculturalism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Gender and Women's Rights · Gender Studies · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy · Religious Freedom and Discrimination