Além da distribuição
A teoria ética da justiça de Honneth
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4816202 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Louis Carré (0000-0002-9787-3064, Université Libre de Bruxelles, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 619 |
| Publication date | 2016-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1519-6089 • E-ISSN: 1984-7289 |
| Publisher | Edipucrs (PUBLISHER • BR) |
| DOI | 10.15448/1984-7289.2015.4.22524 |
| OpenAlex | W2407380167 |
| Language | PT |
| References cited | 14 |
In this paper, the author considers the critique that Axel Honneth has formulated against the distributive model of justice for which Rawls is one of the most important theoretical representatives today. After having outlined the three main limits of the “distributive paradigm” (in terms of proceduralism, atomism, and state-centrism), he then discusses Honneth’s counter-model of justice. Honneth’s “ethical” theory of justice consists in a “normative recognition” of the “institutions of recognition” that allows individuals to experience certain forms of “social freedom” based on mutual recognition. As a conclusion, the author deals with some of the difficulties associated with Honneth’s “ethical” theory of justice
Distributive justice · Distributive property · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Normative · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy
Democratic theory
Foundations of Hegel's Social Theory
Justice, gender, and the family
The Economy as Instituted Process
Freedom's Right
Justice and the Politics of Difference
Rescuing Justice and Equality
Recognition of Love's Labor
Liberalism and the Limits of Justice
Elements of the Philosophy of Right
Philosophy and the Human Sciences
Is the Market a Sphere of Social Freedom
Principles of Social Justice
Spheres of Justice
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |