Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Five Races, One Parliament? Xinhai in Xinjiang and the Problem of Minority Representation in the Chinese Republic

Bibliographic Data

ID4820935
AuthorsDavid Brophy (0000-0003-3595-056X, 1Australian Centre on China in the World, Australian National University)
Year2012
Volume14
Issue2
Pages343-364
Publication date2012-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInner Asia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1464-8172 • E-ISSN: 2210-5018
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/22105018-90000009
OpenAlexW1576708940
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited1

While the early Chinese parliament has been criticised as an ineffective shield against warlord machinations, this article brackets the question of its institutional efficiency and instead treats the National Assembly in terms of the visions of China that were expressed in the process of its construction. Debates on electoral divisions and rules for non- Han regions allow insight into the competing principles by which such territories might be incorporated into the new Chinese nation, and show that the 'Five Races' vision of China provided a meaningful vocabulary for non- Han elites to press for a greater say in the nation's institutions. Although the electoral system preserved the principle of aristocratic privilege in the case of the Mongols and Tibetans, such concessions to ethnic difference could not be applied in Xinjiang, which had had provincial status since the 1880s. To some Muslims, this betrayed the Republic's promise of equality among the 'Five Races', prompting calls for dedicated Muslim representation in the parliament

China · Democracy · Electoral system · Ethnic group · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Privilege (computing · Representation (politics · Sociology · The Republic · Theology · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · Chinese history and philosophy · Philippine History and Culture · Law

  • The Historian's Gaze Essays on Modern and Contemporary China in Honor of Guido Samarani

    Open Access•Laura De Giorgi, Sofia Graziani•The Historian's Gaze Essays on…•2023

  • Socialist and Post-Socialist Mongolia

    Simon Wickhamsmith, Phillip P Marzluf•Socialist and Post-Socialist…•2021

  • Introduction to the Special Issue “Parliamentary formations and diversities in (post-)imperial Eurasia

    Open Access•Ivan Sablin•Journal of Eurasian Studies•2020

  • Old Rebellions, New Minorities

    Open Access•Hannah Theaker•Global Intellectual History•2021

  • On the Huihui Question

    Aaron Nathan Glasserman, Aaron Glasserman•Comparative Studies of South Asia…•2021

  • Late Qing parliamentarism and the borderlands of the Qing Empire—Mongolia, Tibet, and Xinjiang (1906–1911)

    Open Access•Egas Moniz Bandeira•Journal of Eurasian Studies•2020

  • A Place under the Sun

    Open Access•Z Hale Eroglu Sager•Modern China•2021

  • The Hard Road to Reform

    Open Access•Xunqian Liu, Yi Yang•Religions•2022

  • Chinese Democracy

    Charlton M Lewis, John H Fincher et al.•The American Historical Review•1982

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2020 - 2023 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae