Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Medieval Fictions vs. the Fetish of Modernity

Bibliographic Data

ID4821065
AuthorsColin Symes (0000-0002-9748-7446, corresponding author), Carol Symes
Year2020
Volume51
Issue1
Pages235-237
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Literary History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0028-6087 • E-ISSN: 1080-661X
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/nlh.2020.0011
OpenAlexW3015694359
LanguageEN

Odd that fiction would be yet another invention claimed for modernity. Yes, that's the way modernity's game is played; and still I marvel that our modernist colleagues never seem tired of playing it, or insisting on the ontology of their favorite fetish. Julie Orlemanski and Michelle Karnes contest this modernist heuristic and insist instead on fiction's contingency and the crucial role of the reader in its determination, thereby helping to dismantle a hierarchy that requires constant assertions of epistemological inventio to keep itself propped up. In fiction as in all things, medieval texts refuse to operate within the anachronistic generic categories that they have been retroactively assigned

Aesthetics · Anachronism · Art · CONTEST · Contingency · Epistemology · Literature · Modernity · Ontology · Politics · Sociology · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae