Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Blinding Laser Weapons and International Humanitarian Law

Bibliographic Data

ID4822115
AuthorsBengt Anderberg (Swedish Armed Forces), Ove E Bring (Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Ove Bring (Ministry for Foreign Affairs), Myron L Wolbarsht (Duke University)
Year1992
Volume29
Issue3
Pages287-297
Publication date1992-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022343392029003005
OpenAlexW2029051796
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited1

Multilateral arms regulations may restrict or prohibit the production and possession of specific weapons (the disarmament approach) or the use of specific weapons considered excessively inhumane or indiscriminate in their effects (the humanitarian law approach). This article focuses on the second approach, seen against the background of the St Petersburg Declaration of 1868, which states that whenever scientific developments lead towards improvement in armaments, the Contracting Parties will `come to an understanding' in order to `conciliate the necessities of war with the laws of humanity'. The article discusses the prospects for and the legal arguments against battlefield laser weapons which can cause permanent blindness on human beings. Since aggressive use of force is forbidden under the UN Charter, it follows that any use of any weapon is prohibited within the context of aggression. But where international law does not prohibit the use of armed force - as in the case of self-defence or Security Council mandated actions - the right of parties to the conflict to choose methods and means of warfare is not unlimited. The argument is made that systematic use of laser-beams against the eyesight of individuals is prohibited under the existing law of warfare. It is also argued that the use of anti-eye laser weapons is prohibited under existing law, although this conclusion will need to be confirmed in a multilateral document

Charter · Context (archaeology) · Disarmament · International humanitarian law · International law · Political science · Law · Ocular and Laser Science Research

  • The Enduring Legacy of the St Petersburg Declaration

    Emily Crawford•Journal of the History of…•2019

  • Non-Lethal Weapons

    David A Koplow•Non-Lethal Weapons•2009

  • How (not) to stop the killer robots

    Open Access•Elvira Rosert, Frank Sauer•Arms Control•2020

  • The Legal Status of Laser Weapons That Blind

    Open Access•Jeffrey S Morton•Journal of Peace Research•1998

  • Vetting the Advocacy Agenda

    Open Access•R Charli Carpenter•International Organization•2011

  • Assessing Technologies of Political Control

    Open Access•Brian Rappert•Journal of Peace Research•1999

Citations per year0.21
Citation span1998 - 2020 (23)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae