Disaggregating Corruption

A Comparison of Participation and Perceptions in Latin America with a Focus on Mexico1

Bibliographic Data

ID4827166
AuthorsStephen D Morris (University of South Alabama, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume27
Issue3
Pages388-409
Publication date2008-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBulletin of Latin American Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0261-3050 • E-ISSN: 1470-9856
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1470-9856.2008.00276.x
OpenAlexW2123692034
LanguageEN
Citations received33
References cited40

An abundant empirical literature on corruption relying on survey research has emerged since the mid-1990s. The predominant line of inquiry concerns perceptions of corruption with respect to institutions and processes. Another, separate line of inquiry that has enjoyed less attention concerns reports about individuals' participation in corruption. These two dimensions of corruption, however, are typically conflated, leading to error and confusion. This article explores the relationship between the two and seeks to differentiate the two. Using data at the country and individual levels, analysis shows how the two may be only weakly related to one another - though causality remains unclear - and respond to distinct sets of determinants and generate distinct outcomes. The analysis underlines the need to specify the findings in the literature: that the causes and consequences of corruption relate more to 'perceived' corruption rather than actual corruption

Causality (physics · Conflation · Confusion · Development economics · Economics · Epistemology · Language change · Latin Americans · Perception · Political science · Positive economics · Corruption and Economic Development · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Taxation and Compliance Studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub