Having second thoughts
Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 4852877 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Winnie Cheng (0000-0003-0709-0419, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, autor de correspondencia), Martin Warren (0000-0001-6363-6936, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1997 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 233-239 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1997-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Studies in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0307-5079 • E-ISSN: 1470-174X |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03075079712331381064 |
| OpenAlex | W2151464154 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 42 |
| Referencias citadas | 9 |
attempt was made to gauge the students ' attitudes towards peer assessment This was a tw%ld process. the students ' attitudes were canvassed both prior to the peer assessment exercise and at the end of it 771is paper focuses on those students who had second thoughts abollt peer assessment and the reasons given for these shifis in attitude The implications of the findings (or implementing peer assessment on undergraduate courses are then discussed
Higher education · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Peer Assessment · Peer evaluation · Peer feedback · Peer review · Perception · Political science · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Medicine · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Student Assessment and Feedback
The Practical Perceptions of Vietnamese Lecturers and Students Towards Written Peer Feedback
Education students and their teachers
Examination involving students as peer examiners
Peer feedback
Effective peer assessment processes
Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing
‘A Different Voice’ in Peer Feedback
Students’ attitude to peer assessment process
Algorithmic group formation and group work evaluation in a learning analytics-enhanced environment
Student peer review as a process of knowledge creation through dialogue
The impact of interpersonal perceptions on the process of dealing with errors while providing and processing peer-feedback on writing
Is Peer Feedback an Effective Approach for Creating Dialogue in Politics
Enhancing the spaces of reflection
Assessing assessment quality
A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education
Structural validity and invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire
The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment
New lines in edumetrics
Digital video-based peer feedback training
EFL classroom peer assessment
Peer assessment of language proficiency
Self-, peer-, and teacher-assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms
Factors associated with students’ attitude change in online peer assessment – a mixed methods study in a graduate-level course
Preservice mathematics teachers’ beliefs about peer feedback, perceptions of their peer feedback message, and emotions as predictors of peer feedback accuracy and comprehension of the learning task
Academics’ perceptions of the benefits and challenges of self and peer assessment in higher education
‘I’m not here to learn how to mark someone else’s stuff’
Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust
‘Some kind of weird, evil experiment’
Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education
An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading
Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project
Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment
Changes in the reliability and validity of peer assessment across the college years
Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment
Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment
How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study
Metacognition gains in public health graduate students following in-class peer evaluation
Peer and self‐assessment in the first year of university
Does widespread collusion undermine the case for using peer-assessment schemes with assessed group work
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education
Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education
Development of a Peer Assessment Technique for Obtaining Individual Marks on a Group Project
Peer Assessment of an Individual ‘s Contribution to a Group Project
Staff and Peer Assessment ‐ Measuring an Individual's Contribution to Group Performance
Student Attitudes Towards Approaches to Learning and Assessment
Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments
| Obras citantes distintas | 42 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,56 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1999 - 2025 (27) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 39 |