Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Beyond Civil Rights

The Moynihan Report and Its Legacy

Bibliographic Data

ID4856298
AuthorsCatherine Paden (corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume103
Issue3
Pages833.2-834
Publication date2016-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of American History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8723 • E-ISSN: 1945-2314
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/jahist/jaw465
OpenAlexW2909902323
LanguageEN
Citations received2

In Beyond Civil Rights Daniel Geary examines the impact of Daniel Patrick Moynihan's “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action” (also known as the Moynihan Report). Written in 1965, the report has influenced academics, policy makers, social movement leaders, and has shaped both liberal and neoconservative conversations concerning race, gender, and poverty. Fifty years after the publication of the report, Geary sets out to examine how and why it has had, and continues to have, such an impact on our national discourse. Geary explains that unlike many analyses of the Moynihan Report, Beyond Civil Rights is not meant to examine Moynihan's assumptions. Rather, Geary weaves the multiple interpretations of the report with Moynihan's personal and theoretical backgrounds, providing a rich and thorough understanding of the document, its contradictions, and its implications. Based on interviews and Geary's examinations of multiple archival collections Beyond Civil Rights is a nuanced and engaging illumination of the internal contradictions within “The Negro Family,” which drove the variety of interpretations of Moynihan's analysis. Beyond Civil Rights establishes that arguments in the report led liberals and conservatives to accept and renounce its conclusions. For example, some liberals argued that the importance of the Moynihan Report was found in its structural explanations of the importance of job creation programs; however, many of Moynihan's assumptions about pathologies in African American families led liberal scholars and leaders to repudiate his claims. Alternately, conservatives emphasized Moynihan's links between family structure and poverty; the report's lack of policy proposals allowed conservatives to interpret “The Negro Family” as an analysis without specific call for government intervention. In fact, “Moynihan undermined his call for action and sowed the seed of a neoconservative challenge emerging from within postwar liberalism” (p. 72

Civil rights · Civil society · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Sociology · Gender Studies · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Law · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • Marshall Plan or neocolonization? The Model Cities Program and Black planning criticism

    Open Access•Jeremy Lee Wolin•Planning Perspectives•2024

  • Sociology and philosophy in the United States since the sixties

    Open Access•M Strand•Theory and Society•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2024 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae