Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Provinces of Meaning

Determining Cultural Affiliation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act

Bibliographic Data

ID4857793
AuthorsJerry Williams (corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume45
Issue3
Pages272-293
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Indian Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0095-182X • E-ISSN: 1534-1828
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/aiq.2021.0021
OpenAlexW3204584448
LanguageEN

This essay utilizes Alfred Schutz's finite provinces of meaning to understand problems associated with the determination of cultural affiliation under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). Using their own ten-year experience with the NAGRPA consultation process, the author contends that by using multiple provinces of meaning to determine cultural affiliation, NAGPRA failed to adequately consider that by their distinctness, disputes between the oral tradition and science could not be easily resolved within the confines of either. Instead, a resolution would require a resort to yet a third province of meaning, that of the law, which by nature is more closely aligned with science than the oral tradition. As a result, NAGPRA claims made by native people based on the oral tradition found themselves at a distinct disadvantage

Disadvantage · Epistemology · Ethnology · Meaning (existential · Native american · Original meaning · Political science · Repatriation · Sociology · Anthropology · History · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Law · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae