An Accountant Among Economists
Conversations with Sir John R. Hicks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4858535 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arjo Klamer (0000-0002-5793-0490, Visiting Associate Professor of Economics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa., corresponding author) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 167-180 |
| Publication date | 1989-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Economic Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0895-3309 • E-ISSN: 1944-7965 |
| Publisher | American Economic Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1257/jep.3.4.167 |
| OpenAlex | W1987285800 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
Sir John Hicks (1904-1989) has left an indelible impression on modern economic discourse. His Value and Capital (1939) stood as a model for neoclassical microeconomics as economists know it today. His condensation of Keynes's General Theory in the form of the IS / LM diagram became the core of Keynesian macroeconomics. In 1972, he was awarded the Nobel Prize (together with Kenneth Arrow) for his pioneering contributions to modern demand and welfare theory. Later, after his retirement from Oxford University in 1965, he seemed to change course. The older Hicks seemed to have drifted from the mainstream that the younger Hicks had helped to set into motion. The first of two conversations took place in Oxford in early December 1986. In June 1988 we talked again. I went to see Hicks in Blockley, a small village north of Oxford
Arrow · Economic history · Economics · Keynesian economics · Mainstream · Market economy · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Positive economics · Welfare · Economic Theory and Institutions · Economic Theory and Policy · History · Law
Accounting as the master metaphor of economics
The Irony in/of Economic Theory
Reassessing Foucault
The magic market and the Nobel turn
Is-Lm
Currency Boards
Economics and the Modern Economic Historian
Pareto and the 53 Percent Ordinal Theory of Utility
IS-LM à la Hicks versus IS-LM à la Modigliani
High Hicks, Deep Hicks, and Equilibrium
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,29 |
| Citation span | 1992 - 2021 (30) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |