The Knife is Still in Our Backs

Reparations Washing and the Limits of Reparatory Justice Campaigns

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4872992
AutoresK Andrews (0000-0003-0982-3786, autor de correspondencia)
Año2024
Volumen55
Número4
Páginas628-650
Fecha de publicación2024-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDevelopment and Change (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0012-155X • E-ISSN: 1467-7660
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/dech.12848
OpenAlexW4401669021
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas15

The Black Lives Matter movement of 2020 has placed reparations firmly on the international agenda. This article discusses the concept of 'reparations washing' with reference to the measures of two British businesses, Greene King and Lloyd's of London, in acknowledgement of their historical roots in the slave trade, and the Government of the Netherlands' public apology for the country's history of slavery. Reparations washing occurs when corporations or governments give a token nod to reparatory justice to enhance their image and to absolve them of institutional guilt. The article employs Malcolm X's metaphor of slavery, as sticking a knife into the back of the enslaved, to argue that in order to repair the harm caused, the knife needs to be removed and the wound healed. It then analyses the reparations demands contained in CARICOM's Ten Point Plan for Reparatory Justice which exposes the limits of reparatory justice campaigns. The paradox of reparations campaigns is that they ultimately leave intact a system founded on White supremacy and the exploitation of the Global South. It is therefore impossible for reparations to be realized without bringing an end to the current political and economic system. The article concludes that, ultimately, the value of reparations campaigns lies in their highlighting the need for revolution

Business · Economic Justice · Political science · Law · Law in Society and Culture