Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Have contraction

Explaining "Trace Effects" in a Theory Without Movement

Bibliographic Data

ID4890238
AuthorsJulia Barron (corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume36
Issue2
Pages223-252
Publication date1998-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLinguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ling.1998.36.2.223
OpenAlexW2078719110
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited5

The English auxiliary have may reduce to the nonsyllabic form /v/ in certain environments. This phenomenon (known as have contraction) has been adopted by proponents of derivational approaches to syntax (e.g. Radford 1988: 414) as evidence for the existence of traces and of verb movement in general. However, closer examination of the data reveals that have contraction only occurs when three conditions apply: i. when the auxiliary is finite ; ii. when it follows a pronoun with an empty coda; iii. when that pronoun is the whole subject, that is, is not conjoined with any other noun or pronoun. It is not clear how the movement approach can account for conditions (ii) and (iii) above. My proposal is that the frequent occurrence of strings conforming to the above conditions is such that over time the auxiliary verb has become an affix. The solution is offered within the framework of lexical-functional grammar, a unification-based approach in which words and phrases are represented at copresent parallel levels containing functional and categorial information (f-structure and c-structure). The two individual f-structures created by the pronoun and the affix are able to unify to create the larger f-structure of an inflected pronoun. The affix v attaches to its pronominal host through morphological composition using inside-out function application. In this way the affix is able to supply information regarding TENSE and ASP to the whole sentence. This is blocked if the inflected pronoun is part of a conjoined subject, explaining the ungrammaticality of sentences with conjoined NP subjects, one of which is an inflected pronoun. This behavior would not be predicted by theories that assume that have contraction is a purely surface (phrase-structure) phonetic phenomenon

Aesthetics · Contraction (grammar) · Epistemology · Linguistics · Movement (music) · Theoretical linguistics · TRACE (psycholinguistics) · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Formal Grammar, Usage Probabilities, and Auxiliary Contraction

    Open Access•Joan Bresnan•Language•2021

  • Nominal Tense in Crosslinguistic Perspective

    Open Access•Rachel Nordlinger, Louisa Sadler•Language•2004

  • Tense Beyond the Verb

    Open Access•Rachel Nordlinger, Louisa Sadler•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2004

  • Inflected prepositions in Italian

    Open Access•Arnold M Zwicky, Ellen M Kaisse et al.•Phonology Yearbook•1987

  • The Principle of Phonology-Free Syntax

    Open Access•Philip Miller, Philip H Miller et al.•Journal of Linguistics•1997

  • Agreement and pro-drop in some dialects of English

    Open Access•Kersti Börjars, Carol Chapman•Linguistics•1998

  • The morphosyntax of aspect

    Open Access•Randall Hendrick•Lingua•1991

  • The Discourse Basis of Ergativity

    John W Du Bois•Language•1987

Citations per year0.14
Citation span2004 - 2021 (18)
Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae