Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The expression of texture in P'urhepecha

Initial Observations

Bibliographic Data

ID4896838
AuthorsKate Bellamy (0000-0001-5996-1736), Martha Mendoza (0000-0001-7805-2554)
Year2024
Volume24
Pagese024005
Publication date2024-04-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1678-0531 • E-ISSN: 2177-7160
PublisherUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (PUBLISHER • BR)
DOI10.20396/liames.v24i00.8674526
OpenAlexW4394855555
LanguageEN
References cited17

Alongside taste and smell, touch has long been considered one of the 'lower' senses in much of western thought (Classen 1997). However, more recent research indicates that this ranking is not absolute, but that the cultural importance of the senses and their role in constructing worldview is relative, and thus variable (San Roque et al. 2015). Winter (2019: 191) also remarks that touch is high in semantic complexity because it is a frequent source domain in cross-modal language use, for instance, rough voice. Nevertheless, the language of touch has largely been ignored in linguistic description (cf. Essegbey 2013). This paper specifically investigates the language of texture in P'urhepecha, an isolate spoken in western Mexico, focusing on terms obtained by employing the "texture booklet" (Majid et al. 2007). Responses revealed two main morphosyntactic strategies: (i) terms formed from a root that expresses a texture, further subdivided into adjectival and verbal forms, and (ii) a variety of comparison constructions that can be broadly translated by 'like' in English. Ten roots were employed overall, but three of them dominated: ch'era- 'rough', sanu- (and its variant sunu-) 'woolly', and pitsï- (and its variant pichi-) 'smooth'. These describe all ten of the stimulus materials, whereas the minor, less frequent roots, had narrower reference. While further investigation is needed to gain a better understanding of this lexical domain, our preliminary study of texture terms in P'urhepecha adds to the very few sources that have investigated this area of linguistic inquiry, and also deepens our knowledge of the complex morphology and contact-induced features of the language (cf. Chamoreau 2012

Expression (computer science · Linguistics · Taste · Texture (cosmology · Variety (cybernetics · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Mathematics · Multisensory perception and integration · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Philosophy

  • Language Contact

    Open Access•Sarah G Thomason•International encyclopedia of the…•2001

  • Tarascan

    Paul Friedrich•Supplement to the Handbook of…•1984

  • Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies

    Open Access•Lila San Roque, Kobin H Kendrick et al.•Cognitive Linguistics•2014

  • Sensory Linguistics

    Bronwyn Winter, Bodo Winter•Sensory Linguistics•2019

  • Foundations for an anthropology of the senses

    Open Access•Constance Classen•International Social Science…•1997

  • In the Mind's Ear

    Nicholas Evans, David Wilkins et al.•Language•2000

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae