Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Regional Security After the Gulf War

Bibliographic Data

ID4899671
AuthorsMichael N Barnett, Michael Barnett (0000-0002-4773-7638, corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume111
Issue4
Pages597-618
Publication date1996-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0032-3195 • E-ISSN: 1538-165X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2152086
OpenAlexW2317033436
LanguageEN
Citations received4

The Gulf War of 1989-1990 unleashed a regional dialogue concerning what security arrangements should be established to discourage a repetition of this bloody encounter and to foster regional security. Predictably, many of the most affected states scurried in various and sometimes opposite directions in the hurried search for security. Numerous happenings reveal a region engaged in an intense debate over how to organize regional politics and how best to protect the security of its members: the 1990 Damascus Declaration that established a nominal military alliance between the Gulf Arab states, Egypt, and Syria; the rapid military build-ups and inflow of arms transfers; the series of bilateral agreements between various Western and Arab Gulf states; the continuing discussions among the members of the Gulf Cooperation Council; the 1991 Madrid Conference that inaugurated the multilateral talks between Israel and the Arab states; the Declaration of Principles between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) that established a framework for ending the conflict; and the tacit and explicit recognition of Israel's sovereignty by other Arab states. This article focuses on three features of this debate. First, Arab states are exhibiting new patterns of interactions, departing from the promise of close association based on a shared identity and common values. Instead they have converged on rules of the game that revolve around sovereignty and are designed to protect the security of the separate Arab states. But Arab states are also addressing whether they and non-Arab states, notably Israel, should construct common institutions. In doing so they are considering the fundamental relationship between the state's identity and the desired regional order. Second, the region is caught between the impulse of competitive arrangements that celebrate self-help and immediate security gratification and the promise of cooperation that relies on the language of assurance rather than deterrence. The

Alliance · Declaration · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Security interest · Sociology · Sovereign state · Sovereignty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts

  • International Relations of the Middle East

    Louise Fawcett•International Relations of the…•2023

  • Norms Are What States Make of Them

    Vaughn P Shannon•International Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Identities, Borders, Orders

    David A Mcmurray, Yosef Lapid Editors et al.•Identities, Borders, Orders•2001

  • Security status

    Bruce W Jentleson, Dalia Dassa Kaye•Security Studies•1998

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,14
Citation span1998 - 2023 (26)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae