Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Equality and Empire The New York Charter of Libertyes, 1683

Bibliographic Data

ID4899703
AuthorsDavid S Lovejoy (corresponding author)
Year1964
Volume21
Issue4
Pages493
Publication date1964-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe William and Mary Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-5597 • E-ISSN: 1933-7698
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1923303
OpenAlexW2315074793
LanguageEN
Citations received3

H _ > ISTORIANS of colonial America have given over a good deal of space to the course of events between the founding of the colonies and the American Revolution. Through them we have learned much about how colonies were settled and developed and how they were expected to fit the demands of the emerging British Empire. What historians have found difficult to determine is how American colonists felt about themselves as British subjects outside the realm, and what they believed was the colonies' role within the empire. Such an inquiry is, of course, less difficult for the eighteenth century, particularly for the period just before the American Revolution. Events at that time at last forced the colonists to come to terms with the idea of empire and to set limits upon it and upon the power of Parliament in accordance with their own needs and historic assumptions. In the seventeenth century, colonial society was less mature, less stable, and less reflective about itself and its relationship to the Mother Country. No single momentous event like the Revolution united or crystallized colonial thought around definite political or constitutional theories. Rather, each colony went its way, influenced by its own peculiar political, economic, and religious circumstances on the one hand, and by the emerging, yet fitful, colonial policy on the other. At the same time, the English government had not yet determined precisely what the colonists' role was in the larger scheme. Crown, Parliament, and ministry after the Restoration had only begun to decide how their general conclusions about empire ought to be implemented. Despite the unsettledness of the connection between colonies and Mother Country, certain events affecting individual colonies did produce in the seventeenth century reactions which help the historian determine what went on in the minds of the people, who they thought they were, and how they believed they stood in relation to England. A unique situa

Charter · Empire · Political science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law

  • America’s neglected debt to the Dutch, an institutional perspective

    Open Access•Roger D Congleton•Constitutional Political Economy•2008

  • Imperia in Imperio

    Open Access•Daniel J Hulsebosch•Law and History Review•1998

  • Remaking Constitutional Tradition at the Margin of the Empire

    Open Access•Christine Desan, Christine A Desan•Law and History Review•1998

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,11
Citation span1998 - 2008 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae