Financialized accumulation, neoliberal hegemony, and the transformation of the Swedish Welfare Model, 1980-2020
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4906077 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Viktor Skyrman (0000-0003-0365-0124, Stockholm School of Economics, corresponding author), Majsa Allelin (0000-0003-2500-8976, Södertörn University), Markus Kallifatides (0000-0002-2039-0339, Stockholm School of Economics), Stefan Sjöberg (0000-0002-4962-1540, University of Gävle) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 565-591 |
| Publication date | 2023-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Capital & Class (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-8168 • E-ISSN: 2041-0980 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/03098168221128101 |
| OpenAlex | W4298143968 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
| References cited | 62 |
Drawing on a Gramscian Regulation Approach and Harvey's accumulation by dispossession thesis, this article discusses the structural and hegemonic mechanisms of the neoliberal transformation of Sweden's welfare sectors. Providing new longitudinal data on welfare retrenchment, corporate governance, wealth shares, and private economic power, the article further analyzes how the transformation of the Swedish post-war universal welfare model is related to class struggle and accumulation regime change in the Swedish economy. Following a decade-long countermobilization of Swedish capital and a severe economic crisis in the early 1990s, neoliberal economic common sense was cemented among social democratic policy elites that manifested itself in an institutionalized austerity polity, leading to a slow but steady dismantling of the Swedish welfare project. Roughly a fifth of employees in the three largest welfare sectors work in private welfare companies that generate tax-financed profits on politically created welfare markets. Welfare profits are in turn defended by a welfare-industrial complex and undergirded by a hegemonic bloc consisting of capital elites and sympathetic policymakers. In the virtual absence of vocal antihegemonic forces, many social democratic leaders have limited criticism against welfare profits throughout the last decades. On the contrary, austerity measures practiced by Swedish social democrats have thereto led to deteriorating social cohesion and spawned distrust among core social democratic voters
Austerity · Economic system · Economics · Hegemony · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Polity · Retrenchment · Welfare · Welfare capitalism · Welfare state · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Going green at the end of the end of history
Separated targets are not enough
Shades of Swedish climate scepticism
The Uneven Geographies of Platformised Care
Transformations of selective welfare
Navigating multiple displacements
No, she can’t be the hulk!’
Being a Girl Has Become a Public Health Problem!”
Healthcare platform companies and (dis-)embedding strategies
Maintaining Rental Housing as an Asset
Guaranteeing Desirable Futures
Cross-national welfare state research at a theoretical impasse
You become a bit more of a person and a bit less of an institution’
Exploring a green Swedish model
The ‘hidden roots’ of neoliberal fascism
Distributed agency in financial tasks of older people with long-term care needs
Deemed as 'Distant
The myth of middle-class proletarianisation
Teaching schools to compete
Pandemic Care in a Spectral Welfare State
Social Democratic Hauntings
Sweden's race to the bottom
Social policy and welfare state in Sweden
Constructions of Neoliberal Reason
Structural power in comparative political economy
Economic growth and welfare state
European integration studies, European Monetary Union, and resilience of austerity in Europe
The Quest for a Divided Welfare State
Beyond the Regulation Approach
Transformations of the Swedish Welfare State
Capitalist Restructuring, Globalization and the Third Way
Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies
What Characterise the Nordic Welfare State Model
Selections from the Prison Notebooks
Towards a Cultural Political Economy
Case Study Method
The New Imperialism
The long shadow of lobbying
Budget surplus goal experiments in Australia and Sweden
The Marketisation of European Corporate Control
Politics as organised combat – New players and new rules of the game in Sweden
Monetary Union and the Transatlantic and Social Dimensions of Europe's Crisis
Welfare models and demand-led growth regimes before and after the financial and economic crisis
Institutionalism beyond methodological nationalism? The new interdependence approach and the limits of historical institutionalism
Accumulation, Crises, and Ways Out
The Choice Revolution
Swedish Trade Union Consent to Finance‐led Capitalism
Political Aspects of Full Employment 1
The Transnational Politics of Corporate Governance Regulation
The Transformation of the Nordic Models
Regulation Theory and the Political Economy of the European Union
Brief History of Neoliberalism
Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism
The Transformation of the Swedish Model
States' interests as limits to the power of finance
Nordic economic policies in the 1970s and 1980s
Financialization in a Long-Run Perspective
Regulation beyond growth
Theses on the Theory of the State
Accumulation by dispossession and hegemony in place
Resilient privatization
Neoliberalism with Scandinavian characteristics
Reversing the catastrophe of neoliberal-led global capitalism in the time of coronavirus
Comparative analysis of capitalism from a regulationist perspective extended by neo-Gramscian IPE
Revisiting the regulation approach
Bringing in the 'neoliberal model of development
Structural Dependence of the State on Capital
Politics in the Interest of Capital
Rethinking Comparative Political Economy
The Great Trough in Unemployment
Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution
Is a Finance-led growth regime a viable alternative to Fordism? A preliminary analysis
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 11 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |