Attribution of Concepts and Problems With Anachronism1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4907707 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Branko Mitrovic (0000-0002-0457-1316, University of Novi Sad, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 303-327 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History and Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-2656 • E-ISSN: 1468-2303 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1468-2303.2011.00587.x |
| OpenAlex | W1982431917 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Many long-standing debates about anachronistic concept-attributions derive from an essentialist understanding of concepts that is often difficult to sustain for metaphysical or epistemological reasons. The intentionalist alternative to essentialism elaborated in this article successfully clarifies and avoids many standard problems with anachronism
Anachronism · Attribution · Epistemology · Essentialism · Metaphysics · Political science · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2023 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |