From the creativity of collective imagination to the crisis of postmodern fantasy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4907854 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Craig Browne (0000-0002-5929-319X, The University of Sydney, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 114-131 |
| Publication date | 2014-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Thesis Eleven (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0725-5136 • E-ISSN: 1461-7455 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0725513614552467 |
| OpenAlex | W2319401611 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
The Collective Imagination explicates the media of social creativity and explains how the imagination has shaped historically significant social institutions. It focuses on the media of wit, paradox, and metaphor, and develops a distinctive and original interpretation of the imagination's appositional quality. Murphy's conception of the collective imagination is compared with that of Cornelius Castoriadis. The discussion suggests that Murphy's claims are likely to be disputed, particularly because they diverge from the common equation of contemporary creativity with social progress. Murphy draws attention to a kind of conservative disposition that is necessary for imagination to have substantial social efficacy. Murphy claims that the creativity of the collective imagination has to a large extent been eclipsed by fantasy and kitsch. The deleterious effects of fantasy's denial of reality are explored in relation to four domains of collective creativity: art, society, economy and politics. It is argued that the ramifications of Murphy's profound interpretation of the imagination may be developed in ways that differ from some of his conclusions
Aesthetics · Art · Creativity · Epistemology · Fantasy · Genius · Kitsch · Literature · Metaphor · Postmodernism · Sociology · Critical Realism in Sociology · Management and Organizational Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|