Ethical decision-making of supervisors of color

Dados Bibliográficos

ID4911992
AutoresDana Heller Levitt (0000-0002-0874-3808, Department of Counseling Montclair State University Montclair New Jersey USA, autor correspondente), Candice R Crawford (Clinical Mental Health Counseling Program Molloy College Rockville Center New York USA), Shanta Pamphile (0009-0004-4001-5626, Department of Counseling Montclair State University Montclair New Jersey USA)
Ano2022
Volume50
Fascículo2
Páginas59-72
Data de publicação2022-04-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Multicultural Counseling and Development (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0883-8534 • E-ISSN: 2161-1912
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jmcd.12239
OpenAlexW4220839958
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas25

Ethical decision-making is minimally addressed in counseling supervision literature. Supervisors or color may find challenges given the cultural context of both supervision and ethical decision-making. The authors interviewed six supervisors of color about ethical decision-making in supervision. The authors noted four themes: difficulty navigating culture in ethical decision-making, training limitations, "ethical decision-making is for White folks," and making sense of ethical decision-making in supervision. Implications for supervisor preparation, practice, and research are discussed

Context (archaeology · Engineering ethics · Ethical decision · Ethical Leadership · Management · Supervisor · White (mutation · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Psychology · Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications · Social Psychology