Control of information originating from Aboriginal communities
Legal and ethical contexts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4912486 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catherine Bell (0000-0002-0261-4503, University of Alberta), Caeleigh Shier (Birdsell Grant LLP, Stony Plain, Alberta, T7Z 1T8, Canada) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 35-56 |
| Publication date | 2012-10-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Études/Inuit/Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0701-1008 • E-ISSN: 1708-5268 |
| Publisher | Consortium Erudit (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.7202/1012834ar |
| OpenAlex | W2140480242 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 13 |
Access to and control over data and products of research originating from, or about, Aboriginal peoples in Canada arises in multiple legal, ethical, and political contexts. This article addresses three areas frequently implicated in Canada: intellectual property, access to information, and tribunal law and policy. A review of each area demonstrates that effective responses to concerns of Aboriginal peoples in Canada require examination of a wide range of laws implicating Inuit, First Nation, and Métis intangible and tangible cultural heritage. It also underscores the present importance of contracted confidentiality and negotiated ethical and policy frameworks to secure more meaningful control over information
Confidentiality · Control (management · Intellectual property · Management · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Tribunal · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Law
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,27 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2019 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |