Political Party Factionalism and Democracy in Venezuela
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4912708 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steve Ellner (0000-0001-9969-3350, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 87-109 |
| Publication date | 1996-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Latin American Perspectives (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0094-582X • E-ISSN: 1552-678X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0094582x9602300306 |
| OpenAlex | W2089442531 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 12 |
Many political analysts, including orthodox marxists, have assumed that those in the forefront of the effort to achieve authentic democracy are the most committed to popular and nationalistic socioeconomic change. Similarly, they have taken it for granted that the progressive factions of nonleftist parties are more likely to insist on the democratization of their respective organizations than their party machines, which invariably stand to their right. Thus traditional marxism has viewed the struggle for greater democracy and the struggle for socioeconomic reform as inextricably linked, if not one and the same. I will here examine these assumptions in the context of the economic and political crisis that has characterized Venezuela since the early 1980s. The basic objective is to determine how this critical national setting is reflected in the internal life of political parties and whether the factions that have emerged have consolidated themselves by putting forward a coherent set of positions. The analysis is designed to test the generally accepted notion that party factions in Venezuela lack well-defined positions on issues of substance.' Particular attention will be devoted to two issues that have inspired internal controversy: party statutory reforms designed to promote democratization and neoliberal policies. The two largest parties during this period, the nonleftist Accion Democra'tica (Democratic Action-AD) and the Comite de Organizacion Polftica Electoral Independiente (Committee of Independent Electoral Political Organization-COPEI), have experienced acute factional conflict that has forced on them the issue of internal democratization. Factionalism testified to the intensity of the nation's crisis, first in that the factions espoused
Context (archaeology) · Democracy · Democratization · Geography · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Statutory law · Cultural and political discourse analysis · Law · Political Theory and Democracy · Politics and Society in Latin America · Public Administration
Populism and Labor Relations in Venezuela
Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America
Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America
Latin America's Neocaudillismo
Institutional dynamics in loosely coupled federal systems
Grassroots Politics and Oil Culture in Venezuela
The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America
Recent Venezuelan Political Studies
Peasants or Bankers in Venezuela? Presidential Popularity and Economic Reform Approval, 1989-1993
The Workers` Party and Democratization in Brazil
Strong Parties and Lame Ducks
Popular Movements and Political Change in Mexico
The Latin American Left
Left Parties in Regional Power
Paper tigers and minotaurs
Organized Labor's Political Influence and Party Ties in Venezuela
Venezuelan Democracy Under Stress
The Workers' Party and Democratization in Brazil
| Citations per year | 0.31 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1997 - 2018 (22) |
| Highly cited | No |