Obstacles to "race equality" in the English National Health Service

Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena

Datos Bibliográficos

ID4923973
AutoresSarah Salway (0000-0002-7688-5496, University of Sheffield, autor de correspondencia), Ghazala Mir (0000-0002-5277-6885, University of Leeds), Daniel Cross Turner (0000-0003-3741-8729), Daniel Turner (0000-0003-2021-8253), George T H Ellison (0000-0001-8914-6812, University of Johannesburg), Lynne Carter (Humber Teaching NHS Foundation Trust), Kate Gerrish (0000-0001-9370-5330, University of Sheffield)
Año2016
Volumen152
Páginas102-110
Fecha de publicación2016-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.031
PMID26851409
OpenAlexW2251637920
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas14
Referencias citadas20

Inequitable healthcare access, experiences and outcomes across ethnic groups are of concern across many countries. Progress on this agenda appears limited in England given the apparently strong legal and policy framework. This disjuncture raises questions about how central government policy is translated into local services. Healthcare commissioning organisations are a potentially powerful influence on services, but have rarely been examined from an equity perspective. We undertook a mixed method exploration of English Primary Care Trust (PCT) commissioning in 2010-12, to identify barriers and enablers to commissioning that addresses ethnic healthcare inequities, employing:- in-depth interviews with 19 national Key Informants; documentation of 10 good practice examples; detailed case studies of three PCTs (70+ interviews; extensive observational work and documentary analysis); three national stakeholder workshops. We found limited and patchy attention to ethnic diversity and inequity within English healthcare commissioning. Marginalization of this agenda, along with ambivalence, a lack of clarity and limited confidence, perpetuated a reinforcing inter-play between individual managers, their organisational setting and the wider policy context. Despite the apparent contrary indications, ethnic equity was a peripheral concern within national healthcare policy; poorly aligned with other more dominant agendas. Locally, consideration of ethnicity was often treated as a matter of legal compliance rather than integral to understanding and meeting healthcare needs. Many managers and teams did not consider tackling ethnic healthcare inequities to be part-and-parcel of their job, lacked confidence and skills to do so, and questioned the legitimacy of such work. Our findings indicate the need to enhance the skills, confidence and competence of individual managers and commissioning teams and to improve organizational structures and processes that support attention to ethnic inequity. Greater political will and clearer national direction is also required to produce the system change needed to embed action on ethnic inequity within healthcare commissioning

Health care · Health services · Healthcare service · Political science · Population · Project commissioning · Public relations · Publishing · Race (biology · Sociology · Demography · Gender Studies · Global Health Workforce Issues · Health Services Management and Policy · Healthcare Systems and Challenges · Law · Public Administration