Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Embodiment in cognitive linguistic

From Experientialism to Computational Neuroscience

Bibliographic Data

ID4932055
AuthorsHeloísa Pedroso De Moraes Feltes (0000-0002-2875-8660, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume26
Issuespe
Pages503-533
Publication date2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0102-4450 • E-ISSN: 1678-460X
PublisherFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/s0102-44502010000300006
OpenAlexW2048247802
SCIELO_PIDS0102-44502010000300006
LanguageEN
References cited12

The aim of this paper is to reflect on the character of embodiment in the framework of Cognitive Linguistics based on Lakoff, collaborators and interlocutors. Initially I characterize the embodied mind, via cognitive experientialism. In these terms, the theory shapes how human beings build and process knowledge structures which regulate their individual and collective lives. Next, the Neural Theory of Language in which embodiment is rebuilt from a five level paradigm, where structured connectionism carries on the very burden of computational description and explanation is discussed. From these assumption, classical problems about computational implementations for models of natural language functioning as reductionist-physicalist approaches, I then conclude by assuming that embodiment, as an investigation phenomenon, shouldn't be formulated in terms of levels, being treated as interfaces instead, at such manner that: (a) the epistemological commitments should be synchronically sustained in all interfaces of the investigation paradigm; (b) the conventional computational level should be taken as one of the problems which has to be treated in the structured connectionism plan; (c) the strategic reduction levels paradigm and the results obtained from it might imply a kind of modularization of the program of research itself; e (d) the modules would be interdependent only as a result of the reductionist proposal. As a result, I assume that it is possible to do Cognitive Linguistics without adhering to structured connectionism, or to neurocomputacional simulation, as long as one would operate with interfaces constructions between domains of investigation and not with a reductionist features paradigm treated in terms of "levels

Cognition · Cognitive linguistics · Cognitive science · Computational model · Computational theory of mind · Connectionism · Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Interdependence · Linguistics · Mental representation · Reductionism · Sociology · Action Observation and Synchronization · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Language and cultural evolution · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Metaphors We Live By

    George Lakoff, Mark Johnson et al.•Metaphors we live by•2003

  • Connectionism and cognitive architecture

    Open Access•Jerry A Fodor, Zenon W Pylyshyn•Cognition•1988

  • On the proper treatment of connectionism

    Open Access•Paul Smolensky•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1988

  • Psychosemantics

    Jerry A Fodor•Psychosemantics•1987

  • The connectionism/classicism battle to win souls

    Open Access•Brian P Mclaughlin•Philosophical Studies•1993

  • Meaning and mental representations

    Open Access•Joseph DeChicchis•Language Sciences•1992

  • Is Consciousness a Brain Process

    Open Access•Ullin T Place•British Journal of Psychology•1956

  • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things

    Ronald W Langacker, George Lakoff•Language•1988

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae