Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sustaining Food Production through Multifunctionality

The Dynamics of Large Farms in Italy

Bibliographic Data

ID4932476
AuthorsSabine De Rooij (‘Il Centro per lo Sviluppo Agricolo e Rurale’ (Ce.S.A.R.) Università degli Studi di Perugia Generaal Foulkesweg 42 6703 BT Wageningen The Netherlands, corresponding author), Flaminia Ventura (0000-0002-8867-9825, DSEEA‐Dipartimento di Scienze Economico‐Estimative e degli Alimenti (Food and Economic‐Appraisal Science Department) Università degli Studi di Perugia Borgo XX Giugno 74 06121 Perugia Italia, corresponding author), Pierluigi Milone (0000-0001-6087-0348, DSEEA‐Dipartimento di Scienze Economico‐Estimative e degli Alimenti (Food and Economic‐Appraisal Science Department) Università degli Studi di Perugia Borgo XX Giugno 74 06121 Perugia Italia, corresponding author), Jan Douwe Van Der Ploeg (Rural Sociology Group Wageningen University Hollandseweg1 6706 KN Wageningen The Netherlands)
Year2014
Volume54
Issue3
Pages303-320
Publication date2014-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociologia Ruralis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0199 • E-ISSN: 1467-9523
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/soru.12025
OpenAlexW1774758166
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited21

Theoretical approaches to multifunctional agriculture often posit a dichotomy between 'productivist' and multifunctional agriculture. However, this theoretical dichotomy runs counter to the tendency among many 'productivist' farms to now rely, to varying extents, on newly-developed multifunctional activities. In this article we identify four of the main controversies within the complex theoretical and political debates about multifunctional agriculture. These concern whether or not multifunctionality is: (1) a survival strategy mostly followed by small and marginal farms, (2) at the expense of food production, (3) primarily driven by governmental programmes, and (4) only relevant at the farm-level.We use the results of a representative survey among 795 larger farmers across Italy in order to empirically evaluate these arguments. The research results show that larger farmers are also investing in new, multifunctional activities, alongside investments in food production; in fact, these farmers are keeping pace with, or moving ahead of, farmers who only invest in food production. They consider investments in new activities to be a 'life-jacket' that strengthens their agricultural activities. The results also show that government programmes are not decisive factors for farms engaging in or further developing multifunctional activities. The main drivers are family centred, with some farmers also having 'broader' motivations and seeing the wider benefits of multifunctional agriculture

Agricultural economics · Agriculture · Business · Economics · Food processing · Geography · Government (linguistics) · Microeconomics · Order (exchange) · Pace · Political science · Politics · Production (economics) · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Marketing · Rural development and sustainability

  • New generation farmers

    Open Access•Pierluigi Milone, Flaminia Ventura•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • Peasantry in the Twenty-First Century

    Open Access•Jan Douwe Van Der Ploeg•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Unpacking Dutch multifunctional agrarian pathways as processes of peasantisation and agrarianisation

    Open Access•H A Oostindië, Henk Oostindie•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • Revisiting agricultural modernisation

    Open Access•Suvi Huttunen•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • The future of family farming

    Open Access•Julia Suess-Reyes, Elena Fuetsch•Journal of Rural Studies•2016

  • Balancing irrigation multifunctionality based on key stakeholders’ attitudes

    Open Access•Sandra Ricart, Claudio Gandolfi•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Differentiation

    Open Access•Jan Douwe Van Der Ploeg•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2018

  • Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework

    Open Access•H Renting, W A H Rossing et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2009

  • From ‘weak’ to ‘strong’ multifunctionality

    Open Access•Geoff A Wilson•Journal of Rural Studies•2008

  • Rural development and the regional state

    Open Access•Terry Marsden, Roberta Sonnino•Journal of Rural Studies•2008

  • Conceptualizing agriculture

    Open Access•Nick Evans, Carol Morris et al.•Progress in Human Geography•2002

  • Multifunctional agriculture a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development

    Open Access•Naomi Walford, Nigel Walford•Land Use Policy•2005

  • Agricultural multifunctionality, environmental sustainability and the WTO

    Open Access•Clive Potter, Mark Tilzey•Geoforum•2007

  • Dependent Reproduction of Alternative Modes of Agriculture

    Open Access•Brad Coombes, Hugh Campbell•Sociologia Ruralis•1998

  • The Trouble with 'Organic Lite' in California

    Open Access•J Guthman•Sociologia Ruralis•2004

  • Rural Development

    Open Access•Jan Douwe Van Der Ploeg, Henk Renting et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2000

  • Methodological and Conceptual Issues in the Study of Multifunctionality and Rural Development

    Open Access•Karlheinz Knickel, Henk Renting•Sociologia Ruralis•2000

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,64
Citation span2015 - 2019 (5)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae