Negotiating Strategic Planning's Transitional Spaces
The Case of 'Guerrilla Governance' in Infrastructure Planning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4934037 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Crystal Legacy (0000-0002-8687-7297, Centre for Urban Research, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia, corresponding author), Ryan Van Den Nouwelant (0000-0001-6740-9933, City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 209-226 |
| Publication date | 2015-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1068/a140124p |
| OpenAlex | W2112157881 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 35 |
Strategic planning can begin as a deliberative and inclusive process of plan making, but then transition into a decisive and exclusive process of investment and priority setting at the stage of implementation. Citizens who once participated in the formal plan making process through government-designed engagement events fade into the background in this critical latter part of strategic planning. At this point they must invent avenues to influence investment priorities. In the context of bicycle infrastructure planning and delivery in Sydney, Australia this paper examines how strategic plans that embrace cycling as an important transport mode translate into decisions to commit to some projects over others. The paper explores four ways community groups seek traction in a highly contentious and transitional space of planning through a process we call 'guerrilla governance'. Evoking aspects of advocacy and insurgent planning, guerrilla governance broadens how the term 'governance' is used within urban planning scholarship, by incorporating such 'legitimised' agitation from beyond government
Business · Civil engineering · Commit · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Negotiation · Participatory planning · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Strategic planning · Transportation planning · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Urban Planning and Governance · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Finance · Marketing
Dilemma of pursuing livability in China’s urban planning
Cruise infrastructure development in Auckland, New Zealand
Governance arrangements, funding mechanisms and power configurations in current practices of strategic spatial plan implementation
The post-politics of transport
Planning the post-political city
The ungovernable city
The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory
Collaborative Planning
Planning with Complexity
Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined
Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning
Why Bother with Good Works? The Relevance of Public Participation(s) in Planning in a Post-collaborative Era
The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance
Re-enchanting democracy as a mode of governance
Learning Radical Planning
Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective
Why Do Planning Theory
The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning
Planning the Public
Representative Democracy and Its Limits
Post‐political spatial planning in England
Comparative Urban Governance
Resisting Neoliberalization
Insurgent Planning
Variegated neoliberalization
Guerrillas in the Bureaucracy
When the Forum Meets Interest Politics
| Citations per year | 0.56 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2023 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |