"The Cambridge Tradition" Reconsidered
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4934401 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nahid Aslanbeigui, Guy Oakes |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 777-788 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | History of Political Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-2702 • E-ISSN: 1527-1919 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00182702-7202560 |
| OpenAlex | W2900499593 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
Review Article| December 01 2018 "The Cambridge Tradition" Reconsidered The Palgrave Companion to Cambridge Economics. 2 vols. Edited by Cord, Robert A.London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. xvii; 1225 pp. $264.00. Nahid Aslanbeigui; Nahid Aslanbeigui Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Guy Oakes Guy Oakes Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google History of Political Economy (2018) 50 (4): 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7202560 Cite Icon Cite Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Permissions Search Site Citation Nahid Aslanbeigui, Guy Oakes; "The Cambridge Tradition" Reconsidered. History of Political Economy 1 December 2018; 50 (4): 777–788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7202560 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsHistory of Political Economy Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. Copyright © 2018 Duke University Press2018 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal Issue Section: Review Essays You do not currently have access to this content
Citation · Download · Icon · Library science · Political science · Politics · Section (typography · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Economic Theory and Policy · History · Law · Political Economy and Marxism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|