Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mixed Mandates

Issues Concerning Organizational and Statutory Definitions of Terrorism in the United States

Bibliographic Data

ID4935743
AuthorsWesley S Mccann (0000-0002-0332-3724, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, corresponding author), Nicholas Pimley (0000-0002-5094-5382, Washington State University)
Year2020
Volume32
Issue4
Pages807-830
Publication date2020-05-18
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTerrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09546553.2017.1404457
OpenAlexW2783171781
LanguageEN
Citations received6

Defining terrorism continues to be a problematic task for scholars, politicians, and government officials. Research has shown that developing a single definition of terrorism is not only unlikely, but also quite difficult. Definitions of terrorism can arguably be influenced by cultural, social, and political factors. This study qualitatively examines state criminal law and federal organizational definitions of terrorism to discern what elements are commonly seen across such definitions. Furthermore, this article examines what issues arise due to the differences and similarities between and across these groups of definitions. This study finds that organizational definitions are seemingly tied to institution mission or mandate, whereas state definitions are sporadic, lacking consensus, and are evidently influenced by major events such as the September 11 attacks. Across organizational and state definitions of terrorism, “violence, ” “fear, terror, ” and “target” were the most common elements included. However, other definitional elements exhibited different trends when comparing organizational and state definitions of terrorism. Overall, defining terrorism will continue to be a problem in all arenas as long as the definition is allowed to change due to external factors or influences

Criminology · Political science · Sociology · Statutory interpretation · Statutory law · Terrorism · Law · Public Administration · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

  • The establishment of the Absichtsdelikte model of criminal law for controlling terrorist crimes

    Open Access•Kunyi Jian, Peng Nai et al.•International journal of law,…•2019

  • When (and where) can right-wing terrorists be charged with terrorism

    James J Norris•Critical Studies on Terrorism•2020

  • Looking in the mirror

    N Guerra•Critical Studies on Terrorism•2025

  • Unstructured terrorism”? Assessing left wing extremism in Australia

    Kristy Campion•Critical Studies on Terrorism•2020

  • The thin line between militia and terrorist groups

    Hogr Tarkhani•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2024

  • An Analysis of 287(g) Program Memorandums of Agreement

    Open Access•Wesley S Mccann, F D Boateng et al.•Journal of International…•2024

Citations per year0.86
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae