Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Si quis hic sederit

Streetside Benches and Urban Society in Pompeii

Bibliographic Data

ID4936138
AuthorsJeremy Hartnett (0009-0009-0365-322X, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume112
Issue1
Pages91-119
Publication date2008-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9114 • E-ISSN: 1939-828X
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3764/aja.112.1.91
OpenAlexW2003076662
LanguageEN
Citations received9

Built by individual initiative but open to use by city dwellers, Pompeii's 100 streetside benches stood at a pivot point, forming part of the architectural interface between interior, privately financed architecture and the exterior space of the street's public domain. Like many elements of Roman cities, benches have been examined primarily from their builders' viewpoint and within one setting (the elite house and the salutatio). This multiperspective case study calls for a more complex understanding of how and why architectural features were built (or not) along Roman streets. Investigation through aesthetic, legal, and sociohistorical lenses demonstrates that benches—located in front of shops, bars, and houses large and small—were an important part of their owners' streetward presentation, and aided in visually organizing facades and drawing favorable attention from passersby. A quantitative and spatial analysis of benches shows that builders sought out busy and impressive settings for these constructions. It also reveals that the public exerted pressure against bench building where traffic would be obstructed, and expressed favor for bench building in shady spots. The study of street-side benches thus holds potential for understanding the negotiation of individual and public desires in Roman urban society, for thinking not just about the owner-centric insides of buildings or the chaotic outsides but also about the push and pull between those two spheres

Aesthetics · Archaeology · Architectural engineering · Art · Elite · Front (military · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Public domain · Public space · Social science · Sociology · Space (punctuation) · Visual arts · Architecture · Classical Antiquity Studies · Computer Science · Engineering · History · Law · Mechanical Engineering

  • The Material Life of Roman Slaves

    Open Access•Sandra R Joshel, Lauren Hackworth Petersen•Material Life of Roman Slaves•2014

  • Walking in Roman Culture

    Open Access•Timothy M O’Sullivan, Timothy M O'Sullivan•Walking in Roman Culture•2011

  • The Roman Street

    Open Access•Jeremy Hartnett•Roman Street•2017

  • The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome

    Open Access•Amy Russell•Politics of Public Space in…•2015

  • Place-Making at Pompeii

    Peter Keegan, Peter J Keegan•Journal of Urban Archaeology•2024

  • Visualising Ostia’s Processional Landscape Through a Multi-Layered Computational Approach

    Open Access•Katherine A Crawford•Open Archaeology•2019

  • New perspectives on the Roman military base at Bu Njem

    Open Access•Anna H Walas•Libyan Studies•2022

  • Finding Commerce

    Open Access•Claire Holleran•Papers of the British School at…•2017

  • Paving Pompeii

    Eric E Poehler, Benjamin M Crowther•American Journal of Archaeology•2018

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2011 - 2024 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae