Grandir l'événement. L'art et la manière de l'éditorialiste

Bibliographic Data

ID4965684
AuthorsPhilippe Riutort (corresponding author)
Year1996
Volume14
Issue76
Pages61-81
Publication date1996-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRéseaux (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0751-7971 • E-ISSN: 1777-5809
PublisherPERSEE Program (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3406/reso.1996.3709
OpenAlexW2067629835
LanguageFR
Citations received4

Editorial activity differs in several respects from ordinary journalistic activity. The « European » editorialists studied in this article are distinguished from their confreres by their specific position in the division of journalistic work, as well as by a set of professional routines used to grasp events from a distance. Less constrained than most journalists to adhere strictly to the event, editorialists nevertheless operate within a space structured by the relationships they forge with professionals in the political field, their main source of information. In order to appropriate the event, editorialists adopt a number of pedagogical standpoints aimed at retranslating it to suit the presumed expectations of the « public ». Mutually committed to consolidated interactions, they share similar definitions of the event and thus engage in « partial » rivalry in which the only issue at stake is the « meaning ». The main effect of this competition is to render the editorial excessively explanatory

Competition (biology · Epistemology · Event (particle physics · Field (mathematics · Meaning (existential · Media studies · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Rivalry · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Computer Science · Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts · Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies · French Urban and Social Studies · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOI