The Rationality Wars

Amid contemporary discussions about the relationship of logic to knowing, an entirely different conversation about the moral status of rationality is taking place between Chinese and Western thinkers. Although most would agree that deductive thought has been a highly privileged feature of the Western philosophical tradition since Plato (for good or bad), the question of its role in Confucian thought is less clear-and considerations of this topic tend to be highly charged. In turn, the question of whether the West has been tarred by a Weberian descent into a merely instrumental form of rationality has emerged as a hot topic in Chinese scholarship. However, the question merely supplies a way of engaging in cross-cultural comparisons that are political rather than genuinely philosophical in nature. This article explores the sparring over terminology and concepts that characterizes this recent trend in scholarship. Ultimately, it suggests that instead of Chinese scholars appropriating the ideas of Western authors in order to raise anti-Western specters of spiritual derangement, both traditions would be better off discarding this outdated and essentializing terminology in the first place

Aesthetics · China · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Greeks · Linguistics · Modernity · Political science · Politics · Rationality · Scholarship · Sociology · Terminology · Western thought · Chinese history and philosophy · Classics · History · Law · Philosophy · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory