Policy fixes, public funds, and political frustration
An American researcher looks at European health reform
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4973995 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lawrence D Brown (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 315-329 |
| Publication date | 2006-12-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revue française des affaires sociales (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0035-2985 • E-ISSN: 2111-4358 |
| Publisher | CAIRN (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3917/rfas.en606.0315 |
| OpenAlex | W1656780347 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 14 |
In Western nations health reform has become a ceaseless quest in which myriad ameliorative strategies compete for policy prominence. Although health policy researchers and analysts mainly focus on measures to improve the workings of the health care system (for example, evidencebased medicine and information technology) or to transform it (for instance, priority setting and managed competition), in practice, the reforms at center stage are those that sustain the system by pumping additional resources into it. The quaint discipline of public finance deserves fresh attention in debates about health reform
Competition (biology) · Focus (optics) · Health care · Health care reform · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public policy · Public relations · Global Health Care Issues · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Health Policy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |