Of Two Minds about a Theology without Walls
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4975567 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Heim, S Mark Heim (0000-0002-2809-0234, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 479-486 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of ecumenical studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0558 • E-ISSN: 2162-3937 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/ecu.2016.0043 |
| OpenAlex | W2588455297 |
| Language | EN |
This essay explores the coherence and plausibility of a “transreligious theology,” asking whether there is, in fact, a distinctive methodology, a novel set of conclusions, or an operative community that could correspond to this project. It seems such a project can be distinguished from comparative theology in incremental respects. It seems questionable that there are major undiscovered options in the religious landscape. There does appear to be a viable audience and even a spiritual community that could find affinity with the project—the religiously unaffiliated but spiritually engaged. In sum, while ambivalent about the future of a theology without walls as a new movement, the author is intrigued by the conversation it fosters
Aesthetics · Ambivalence · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Comparative Theology · Conversation · Epistemology · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Theology · Christian Theology and Mission · Computer Science · Philosophy · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Society, and Development · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |