The Pace trial
It's time to broaden perceptions and move on
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4977446 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Keith J Petrie (0000-0002-6337-2480, University of Auckland), Janice Weinman (0000-0002-6786-0166), John Weinman (King's College London) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1198-1200 |
| Publication date | 2017-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Health Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1359-1053 • E-ISSN: 1461-7277 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1359105317703789 |
| PMID | 28805523 |
| OpenAlex | W2605716925 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 7 |
The continued critiques of the PACE trial highlight how differing beliefs about the causes of chronic fatigue syndrome still influence how scientific studies in this area are accepted and evaluated. Causal beliefs about chronic fatigue syndrome and a modern version of Cartesian dualism are important in understanding the reaction to the PACE trial. The continued debate on the PACE trial seems to miss the fact that science is incremental. An unfortunate outcome of the PACE controversy and intimidation of researchers may be less research in the area. It is time to move on from criticism and collect more data on effective treatments
Alternative medicine · Criticism · Pace · Perception · Political science · Psychotherapist · Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research · Medicine · Psychology · Law
Acceptance & Commitment Therapy for ME/CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) – A feasibility study
Further commentary on the Pace trial
Assessment of the scientific rigour of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise therapy for patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome
Chronic fatigue syndrome patients have no reason to accept the Pace trial results
Special issue on the Pace Trial
Defense of the Pace trial is based on argumentation fallacies
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2020 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |