On the Uses of Social Science Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4981114 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William Foote Whyte (0000-0001-6955-1554, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 555 |
| Publication date | 1986-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Sociological Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-1224 • E-ISSN: 1939-8271 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2095587 |
| OpenAlex | W2333374739 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 3 |
To provide a basis for judgment on federal support for social science research, in 1985 a task force of the House Science and Technology Committee directed the Congressional Research Service to report on the extent to which such research has proven to be of practical value. The CRS draft report seemed to me to provide a very weak case for such support. When David Jenness, Executive Director of COSSA, brought this report to my attention, I rushed to provide him with further ammunition. An article that appears in an academic journal long after a Congressional Committee has asked for information and ideas will have no influence on Congress, but the problems of demonstrating to policy makers (and to ourselves) the practical utility of social research will remain with us for many years to come. I am not undertaking a broad and general review of the practical contributions of social research. I limit myself to lines of research which I know best. I have been involved in organizational research in industry since 1943 in the U.S., Latin America, and Spain. From 1964 to 1983 I was involved in agricultural and rural development research in Latin America. Throughout my professional career, I have been operating from a secure academic base. Those whose primary experience has been in private consulting or employment in other organizations will, of course, have other perspectives, which I hope they will contribute to further discussion. I begin by summarizing the thesis of the CRS report and adding my own comments. I then raise additional points that help to explain the current weak position of applied social research. Finally, I provide examples of research projects or programs that have been overcoming these limitations. Since the success stories are drawn from my own experience and from that of colleagues who share some of my own interests, what follows may seem self-serving. I could overcome this impression by reporting my own numerous failures to link research with action, but such coverage would require many more pages and would deflect me from the main point of this article: that behavioral scientists are achieving some success in applied research. I also argue for broadening the CRS conception of potential users of social science research. The
Sociology · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Educational Research and Science Teaching · Management Theory and Practice · Psychology
Select Your Social Scientist with Care
Reinventing Real Estate
In the shadow of legalism
Building Policy-Related Technical Communities
Social Problems Research and Civic Discourse
Changing contexts and the field of community psychology
Participatory action research with self‐help groups
Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal
The Pull of the Policy Audience
The implementation of health promotion
Fielding hot topics in cool settings
Policy Analysis and Utilization Process
Women Workers in the Mondragon System of Industrial Cooperatives
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,31 |
| Citation span | 1984 - 2014 (31) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |