Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A critical gaze and wistful glance at Handbook histories of social psychology

Did the successive accounts by Gordon Allport and successors historiographically succeed

Bibliographic Data

ID4990229
AuthorsIan Lubek (0000-0003-1491-1705, University of Guelph, corresponding author), Erika Apfelbaum (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
Year2000
Volume36
Issue4
Pages405-428
Publication date2000-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-5061 • E-ISSN: 1520-6696
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36:4<405::aid-jhbs7>3.3.co;2-u
OpenAlexW4234335090
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Gordon Allport's account of the development of social psychology in the 1954 Handbook of Social Psychology became, de facto, a standard or official historical reference for researchers and apprentices. His history also provided the field's ontological center point with a definition of social psychology that would become predominant. The revised and updated chapter appeared posthumously in 1968, was then reprinted (lightly edited) in 1985, but was removed from the 1998 Handbook. In 1966, Allport prepared a parallel evaluation of six decades of the history of social psychology, for a conference on graduate education in social psychology. This paper was critical of “elaborate mendacious experimentation” and ended with a plea for an interdisciplinary cross-cultivation. It was rarely cited. Ironically, it was Allport's “official” history, his justificatory Handbook account, that often was used for graduate mentoring rather than the more critical history, specifically written to address issues of graduate education. Other “official” Handbook historical chapters that succeeded Allport's displayed less breadth of geographical and transdisciplinary coverage and offered a shorter temporal, more presentist, and more selective personalist historical perspective. In contrast to more contextualist accounts, these Handbook chapters are constrained in a number of ways that raise questions about the success, functions, and professional consequences of such “official” histories, and who should write them. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Critical psychology · Epistemology · History of psychology · Plea · Political science · Psychoanalysis · Social science · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Instituer les neurosciences sociales

    Open Access•Wolf Feuerhahn•Le mental et le social•2013

  • Getting miles away from Terman

    Peter Hegarty•History of Psychology•2011

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.13
Citation span2011 - 2013 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae