Assessing impacts of environmental peacebuilding in Caquetá, Colombia

A Multistakeholder Perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID4995372
AuthorsHéctor Morales-Muñoz (0000-0002-0508-1271), Katharina Löhr (0000-0003-2691-9712), Michelle Bonatti (0000-0001-8511-5365), Luca Eufemia (0000-0002-0211-8526), Stefan Sieber (0000-0002-4849-7277)
Year2021
Volume97
Issue1
Pages179-199
Publication date2021-01-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Affairs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ia/iiaa175
OpenAlexW3118576172
LanguageEN
Citations received10

A major challenge in the field of environmental peacebuilding is showing the impact of its initiatives. Questions emerge, such as what kind of postwar peacebuilding dimensions are more likely to be affected by natural resource management projects? Although quantitative studies assess the relation between natural resource management programmes and conflict, the question remains: what are the mechanisms involved in implementing projects designed for environmental peacebuilding? To answer these questions, a mixed methods research approach is chosen, combining four qualitative and quantitative methods to triangulate results. First, we identify a set of peacebuilding dimensions and mechanisms based in the literature that facilitate assessing the impact of sustainable land-use systems (SLUS) design in the post-peace agreement region of Caquetá, Colombia. Second, not only do we interview experts and practitioners at global, national (Colombia) and local (Department of Caquetá) levels in the fields of peacebuilding, natural resource management and environmental peacebuilding, we also conduct three workshops and a survey in Caquetá to prioritize dimensions and discover explanatory mechanisms. The case of Caquetá, Colombia, shows that peacebuilding dimensions, such as socio-economic inclusion (e.g. sustainable livelihoods), creation of governance scenarios, and building capacities for dialogue and a peace culture, should be addressed to take account of the impacts of SLUS projects in post-conflict peacebuilding

Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Livelihood · Management · Natural resource · Natural resource management · Peacebuilding · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia · Peacebuilding and International Security · Public Administration · Transboundary Water Resource Management

Tools

Open DOI