Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A ten-year community reporting database reveals rising coyote boldness and associated human concern in Edmonton, Canada

Bibliographic Data

ID5003100
AuthorsJonathan Farr, Jonathan James Farr (0000-0003-1377-0920), Matthew Pruden, Matthew J Pruden (0000-0003-0790-5681), Robin Glover (0009-0000-9296-2474), Maureen Murray, Maureen H Murray (0000-0002-2591-0794), Scott Sugden (0000-0002-6482-4733), Howard Harshaw, Howard W Harshaw (0000-0001-9568-772X), Colleen Cassady St Clair (0000-0002-3378-795X)
Year2023
Volume28
Issue2
Publication date2023-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueConservation Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1195-5449 • E-ISSN: 1708-3087
PublisherResilience Alliance (PUBLISHER • CA)
DOI10.5751/es-14015-280219
OpenAlexW4378071124
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited19

In cities throughout North America, sightings of coyotes ( Canis latrans ) have become common. Reports of human-coyote conflict are also rising, as is the public demand for proactive management to prevent negative human-coyote interactions. Effective and proactive management can be informed by the direct observations of community members, who can report their interactions with coyotes and describe the location, time, and context that led to their interactions. To better understand the circumstances that can predict human-coyote conflict, we used a web-based reporting system to collect 9134 community-supplied reports of coyotes in Edmonton, Canada, between January 2012 and December 2021. We used a standardized ordinal ranking system to score each report on two indicators of human-coyote conflict: coyote boldness, based on the reported coyote behavior, and human concern about coyotes, determined from the emotions or perceptions about coyotes expressed by reporters. We assigned greater scores to behaviors where coyotes followed, approached, charged, or contacted pets or people, and to perceptions where reporters expressed fear, worry, concern, discomfort or alarm. Using ordered logistic regression and chi-square tests, we compared boldness and concern scores to spatial, temporal, and contextual predictors. Our analysis showed that coyotes were bolder in less developed open areas and during the pup-rearing season, but human concern was higher in residential areas and during the dispersal season. Reports that mentioned dogs or cats were more likely to describe bolder coyote behavior, and those that mentioned pets or children had more negative perceptions about coyotes. Coyote boldness and human concern both indicated rising human-coyote conflict in Edmonton over the 10 years of reporting

Archaeology · Biological dispersal · Biology · Boldness · Canis · Geography · Human–wildlife conflict · Personality · Population · Sparrow · Wildlife · Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies · Demography · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • Coexisting with wild canine neighbours

    Open Access•Gail J Kuhl, Constance Russell•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2025

  • Sociodemographic and regional differences in human–coyote interactions and human attitudes towards coyotes

    Open Access•Emily Zepeda, Elizabeth Elliot Noe et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • Modern Applied Statistics with S

    Open Access•W N Venables, Brian D Ripley•Modern Applied Statistics with S…•2002

  • Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world

    Open Access•Hannes König, Christian Kiffner et al.•Conservation Biology•2020

  • Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas

    Open Access•Carl D Soulsbury, Piran C L White•Wildlife Research•2016

  • The eBird enterprise

    Open Access•Brian L Sullivan, Jocelyn L Aycrigg et al.•Biological Conservation•2014

  • The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data

    Open Access•J Aitchison•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•1982

  • Type I Error Rate Comparisons of Post Hoc Procedures for I j Chi-Square Tables

    Open Access•Paul L MacDonald, Robert C Gardner•Educational and Psychological…•2000

  • Coyote Attacks on Humans in the United States and Canada

    Lynsey A White, Stanley D Gehrt•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2009

  • Living with Problem Animals—Self-Reported Fear of Potentially Dangerous Species in the Serengeti Region, Tanzania

    Bj⊘rn P Kaltenborn, Tore Bjerke et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2006

  • Coyote ( Canis latrans ) Interactions With Humans and Pets Reported in the Canadian Print Media (1995–2010)

    Shelley M Alexander, Michael S Quinn•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2011

  • Temporal patterns of human-fox interactions as revealed from internet searches

    Carl D Soulsbury•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2019

  • Shifts in Attitudes Toward Coyotes on the Urbanized East Coast

    Jennifer Jackman, Jennifer L Jackman et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2015

  • Risk perception as a factor in Wildlife Stakeholder Acceptance Capacity for cougars in montana

    Shawn J Riley, Daniel J Decker•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2000

  • Human–Coyote Interactions in Calgary, Alberta

    Victoria M Lukasik, Shelley M Alexander•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2011

  • Using community science data to investigate urban Coyotes ( Canis latrans ) in Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Open Access•Christopher B Mowry, Adél Lee et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2020

  • Factors Affecting Perceptions of Human–Wildlife Interactions in Residential Areas of Northern New York and Implications for Conservation

    Heidi E Kretser, Paul D Curtis et al.•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2009

  • Troublemaking carnivores

    Open Access•Andrea T Morehouse, Mark S Boyce•Conservation Ecology•2017

  • Tolerance for cougars diminished by high perception of risk

    Open Access•Aliah Adams Knopff, Kyle H Knopff et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

  • Multimodel Inference

    Open Access•Kenneth P Burnham, David R Anderson•Sociological Methods & Research•2004

  • How Urban Identity, Affect, and Knowledge Predict Perceptions About Coyotes and Their Management

    Michael Drake, Michael D Drake et al.•Anthrozoös•2020

Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae