Demystifying "localness" of infrastructure assets
Crowdfunders as local intermediaries for global investors
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5010628 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kate Gasparro (0000-0002-7564-5837, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, corresponding author), Ashby Monk (Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 878-897 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0308518x19887181 |
| OpenAlex | W2982765249 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 61 |
Infrastructure assets are networked, urban products that can only be understood through their social, economic, and physical geographies. Because of this, they remain difficult to value and monitor. Recently, financialization of infrastructure assets has codified this information for larger capital markets. But the local knowledge needed to understand local infrastructure assets (LIAs), smaller urban products that are closely intertwined in a community's economic trends and social fabric, is prohibitive to increased investment. At a time when there is a need for renewed investment in LIAs, a new intermediary, capable of translating "localness," has emerged. LIA crowdfunding platforms connect capital-seeking agents (asset owners) with capital-giving agents (crowdfunders) to channel resources into LIAs. Through close dialogue and review of nearly 70 LIA crowdfunding platforms, we find that LIA crowdfunding platforms are creating a new marketplace for investments in LIAs. These platforms (a) select crowdfunding models that reflect specific asset values; (b) accredit LIAs and their capital-seeking agents considering local context; (c) translate local knowledge for nonlocal and novice capital-giving agents; and (d) reflect the demand for LIAs. Together, these strategies reduce information asymmetries and translate implicit asset information to nonlocal capital-giving agents, thereby facilitating investments into LIAs. Because of their modest growth, LIA crowdfunding platforms have yet to realize their full potential. To scale, crowdfunding platforms must understand their power in complementing the current infrastructure investment market and focus on how their unique position can unlock new investments in LIAs
Business · Economics · Financialization · Industrial organization · Intermediary · Politics · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Sharing Economy and Platforms · Finance
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures
Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust
Three provocations for civic crowdfunding
Is the crowd sensitive to distance?—how investment decisions differ by investor type
Austerity in the city
The financialisation of infrastructure
Reconceptualizing urban governance through a new paradigm for urban infrastructure networks
The emerging market for intellectual property
Buzz
Infrastructure as a traded product
Civic crowdfunding research
Intermediaries and Cybermediaries
The Role of Intermediaries in the Development of Trust on the WWW
Clusters and knowledge
Building cities on financial assets
The Private Provision of Urban Infrastructure
Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity
Stylized Facts and Close Dialogue
On the Political Vernaculars of Value Creation
Selling City Futures
Forging Glocal Governance? Urban Infrastructures as Networked Financial Products
Crowdfunding the city
Constructing premium network spaces
Capitalizing on the crowd
The microgeographies of global finance
This can('t) be an asset class
Public-Private Partnership Networks
Economic Geographies of Financialization
The Capitalization of Almost Everything
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |