Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Theories of Change in Rural Policy Evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID5017402
AuthorsDamian Maye (0000-0002-4459-6630, Professor of Agri‐Food Studies, Countryside and Community Research Institute University of Gloucestershire Swindon Road Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL50 4AZ UK, corresponding author), Gareth Enticott (0000-0001-5510-9597, Reader in Human Geography Cardiff School of Planning and Geography Cardiff University Cardiff UK), Rhiannon Naylor (0000-0002-2024-6601, Senior Lecturer in Rural Land Use and Management Royal Agricultural University Cirencester UK)
Year2020
Volume60
Issue1
Pages198-221
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociologia Ruralis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0199 • E-ISSN: 1467-9523
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/soru.12269
OpenAlexW2972193452
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited54

Rural policy evaluation helps to understand the extent to which policies have met pre-defined objectives, achieve value for money and learn from implementation failures. However, there is increasing debate over the quality of policy evaluation and the extent to which its methods can fully contribute to an understanding of rural policy. Responding to these calls, this article employs a theory driven approach to policy evaluation to assess the social impacts of attempts to reduce animal disease on farms in England. Popular in other policy arenas, theory driven evaluation relies on developing a theory of change to examine the interactions between policy contexts and mechanisms and policy outcomes and determine what works for whom. Drawing on longitudinal qualitative and quantitative research, the article identifies two mechanisms of change to evaluate the Badger Vaccine Deployment Project (BVDP) in England to reduce incidence of bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle. The article shows how these mechanisms - 'seeing is believing' and 'practice similarity' - are triggered by different contextual factors leading to the failure to deliver expected policy outcomes. We also consider the advantages and limitations to theory based evaluation, and the contribution it can make to the evaluation of other rural development programmes

Economics · Management · Political science · Public economics · Public relations · Theory of change · Value (mathematics) · Variety (cybernetics) · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Computer Science · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Rural development and sustainability

  • An evaluation of the ‘bottom-up’ implementation of the Active at school! programme in Quebec, Canada

    Open Access•Véronique Gosselin, Noémie Robitaille et al.•Health Promotion International•2022

  • La cuestión rural en los programas de los partidos políticos en las elecciones de 2019

    Open Access•Maria Angeles Abellan Lopez, María Ángeles Abellán-López et al.•Tendencias Sociales Revista de…•2020

  • How and why are Theory of Change and Realist Evaluation used in food security contexts? A scoping review

    Open Access•Steven Lâm, Warren Dodd et al.•Evaluation and Program Planning•2021

  • Policy intervention mechanism on farmers’ intention to promote water-saving irrigation

    Open Access•Wenjing Duan, Yanshu Yin et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2026

  • Responsibilising the Fairtrade Premium

    Open Access•Allison Loconto, Allison Marie Loconto et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Farmer‐led badger vaccination in Cornwall

    Open Access•Rosie Woodroffe, Kelly Astley et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Will the EU deforestation-free products regulation (Eudr) reduce tropical forest loss? Insights from three producer countries

    Open Access•Roldan Muradian, Raras Cahyafitri et al.•Ecological Economics•2025

  • How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway?

    Open Access•CAROL H WEISS•Evaluation Review•1997

  • Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions

    Open Access•Thomas Dietz, Gerald T Gardner et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2009

  • Triggering change

    Open Access•Lee-Ann Sutherland, Lee‐ann Sutherland et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2012

  • Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation

    Open Access•W Poortinga, Nick Pidgeon et al.•Risk Analysis•2003

  • Reporting on Outcomes

    John Mayne•Canadian Journal of Program…•2004

  • Investigating the impacts of increased rural land tenure security

    Open Access•Daniel Higgins, Tim Balint et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • The British 2001 Foot and Mouth crisis

    W Poortinga, Karen Bickerstaff et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2004

  • Evidence-based Policy

    Open Access•Ray Pawson•Evaluation•2002

  • Evaluating complex interventions

    Open Access•Boru Douthwaite, John Mayne et al.•Evaluation•2017

  • Theories of Change and Realistic Evaluation

    Open Access•Avril Blamey, Margaret Mackenzie•Evaluation•2007

  • Speeches and Addresses

    Open Access•Steve Martins•Evaluation•2005

  • Evaluation Research and the Performance Management Movement

    Open Access•Ann Bonar Blalock•Evaluation•1999

  • Theory-Based Evaluation and Types of Complexity

    Open Access•Nicoletta Stame•Evaluation•2004

  • Evaluation in an Age of Indicators

    Open Access•Carol Taylor Fitz‐gibbon, Carol Taylor Fitz-Gibbon•Evaluation•2002

  • The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy

    Open Access•Carol Hirschon Weiss•Evaluation•1999

  • Strengthening patient-centred communication in rural Ugandan health centres

    Open Access•Susan Nayiga, Deborah DiLiberto et al.•Evaluation•2014

  • Honoring Lived Experience

    Open Access•Emma Richardson, Emma Z L Richardson et al.•American Journal of Evaluation•2018

  • The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits

    Open Access•Melissa L Finucane, Ali Alhakami et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2000

  • How should rural policy be evaluated if it aims to foster community involvement in environmental management

    Open Access•Katrin Prager, Birte Nienaber et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2015

  • A gentleman's handshake’

    Open Access•Rhiannon Fisher•Journal of Rural Studies•2013

  • Rural development and the regional state

    Open Access•Terry Marsden, Roberta Sonnino•Journal of Rural Studies•2008

  • Deprivation, poverty and marginalization in rural lifestyles in England and Wales

    Open Access•Paul Cloke, Marjorie Goodwin et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•1995

  • Animal disease and narratives of nature

    Open Access•Damian Maye, Gareth Enticott et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • Setting the next agenda? British and French approaches to the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy

    Open Access•Philip Lowe, Henry Buller et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2002

  • Using scenario-based influence mapping to examine farmers’ biosecurity behaviour

    Open Access•Damian Maye, Gareth Enticott et al.•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern

    Open Access•John Thøgersen•Journal of Economic Psychology•1999

  • European Rural Development under the Common Agricultural Policy's ‘Second Pillar’

    Janet Dwyer, Neil Ward et al.•Regional Studies•2007

  • The Potential Application of Qualitative Evaluation Methods in European Regional Development

    Frank Vanclay•Regional Studies•2013

  • The ecological paradox

    Open Access•Gareth Enticott•Transactions of the Institute of…•2008

  • Getting beneath the surface in program planning, monitoring and evaluation

    Open Access•Marina Apgar, Will Allen et al.•Action Research•2016

  • Misunderstood misunderstanding

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Public Understanding of Science•1992

  • Social Learning in Leader

    Open Access•Chris High, Gusztáv Nemes•Sociologia Ruralis•2007

  • Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo-endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place-Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts

    Open Access•Mark Shucksmith•Sociologia Ruralis•2010

  • Exploring complex causal pathways between urban renewal, health and health inequality using a theory-driven realist approach

    Open Access•Roshanak Mehdipanah, Ana Manzano et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Seeing Through the 'Good Farmer's' Eyes

    Open Access•Rob J F Burton•Sociologia Ruralis•2004

  • The 'Good Farmer

    Open Access•Rhiannon Naylor, Alice Hamilton‐webb et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2018

  • Rural Development

    Open Access•Jan Douwe Van Der Ploeg, Henk Renting et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2000

  • True Cowmen and Commercial Farmers

    Open Access•Orla Shortall, Lee‐ann Sutherland et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2018

  • Badger Vaccination

    Open Access•Gareth Enticott, Damian Maye et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2014

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,17
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae