The Political Economy of the Chinese Market Economy Status given by Argentina and Brazil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5034864 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Francisco Urdinez (0000-0003-3333-478X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Issue | 14 |
| Pages | 47-76 |
| Publication date | 2014-12-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista CS (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2011-0324 • E-ISSN: 2665-4814 |
| Publisher | Universidad Icesi (PUBLISHER • CO) |
| DOI | 10.18046/recs.i14.1853 |
| OpenAlex | W1929177720 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 7 |
When China signed a Protocol of Accession to the World Trade Organization in December 2001, other country members were allowed to consider China as a Non-Market Economy until the end of 2016. Taking into account this restraint, the aim of this paper is to answer the following question: can the Market Economy Status Recognition (MES) be measured by a de-facto compliance? The variable used to measure the compliance is the number of antidumping investigations initiated by each country. Hence, the countries which recognize China as a market economy would have a fewer antidumping investigations than the countries that are still treating Beijing as a Non Market Economy, which is the key reason of why the Chinese Government has been campaigning vigorously since 2001 to gain a MES status by a larger number of its economic partners
Accession · Beijing · Business · China · Chinese economy · De facto · Economics · Economy · International trade · Political science · Economic Zones and Regional Development · Global trade and economics · World Trade Organization Law
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2020 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |