An initial study of the dynamic influences and interactions upon levels of sustainability at the global spatial scale
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5081259 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jason Phillips (0000-0003-1459-4658, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 494-536 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Anthropocene Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-0196 • E-ISSN: 2053-020X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20530196211035805 |
| OpenAlex | W3187783374 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 22 |
This paper conducts an initial determination and evaluation of the fundamental dynamic influences and interactions upon indicated levels and nature of sustainability occurring, at the global spatial scale over the specified period of 2006-2016. This is achieved by the first full application of the Sustainability Dynamics Framework (SDF) to the results of the Sustainable Society Index (SSI). The results indicate that obtained S-values are potentially influenced primarily by a triumvirate of influencing factors - Population Growth, GDP and Greenhouse Gases. A cumulative analysis of indicator categories indicated that Environmental Wellbeing was the dominant influencing category upon obtained S-values for the period 2008-2014, and Anthropospheric Wellbeing was the dominant influence in 2006 and 2016. The analysis concludes that the triumvirate has potentially caused fundamental breaches and dynamic impacts and feedbacks upon the global environment-human relationship and system. Unless the triumvirate is managed and mitigated urgently, then there is a potential realistic risk of unsustainability occurring
Biology · Cartography · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Population · Population growth · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable development · System dynamics · Demography · Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy · Ecology
Is There Commonality in Global Sustainability From Different Environment‐Human Perspectives
Quantifying the levels, nature, and dynamics of sustainability for the UK 2000–2018 from a Brundtland perspective
Determining the fundamental dynamics of global sustainability in the Anthropocene from a vulnerability perspective
Dynamic scenario modelling of the role and influence of Brundtland and vulnerability upon sustainability in the UK in the Anthropocene
Quantitative and dynamic scenario analysis of SDGs outcomes upon global sustainability 1990-2050
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Critical Transitions in Nature and Society
The application of the Geocybernetic Assessment Matrix to the UN 2030 Sustainable Development Goals
A comprehensive index for a sustainable society
The advancement of a mathematical model of sustainable development
Uncovering the political dimension of social-ecological systems
Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems
Down to Earth
From Planetary Boundaries to national fair shares of the global safe operating space — How can the scales be bridged
Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene
Methods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene
The Sustainability Dynamics Framework – A holistic approach to define and evaluate sustainability and unsustainability in the Anthropocene
A quantitative approach to determine and evaluate the indicated level and nature of global ecological sustainability
Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways
Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science
Planetary Boundaries
The Anthropocene equation
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |