B Effects
Bonds of Form and Time in Barthes, Blanchot and Beckett
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5090977 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laurent Milesi (0000-0003-2922-5150, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 157-171 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Paragraph (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-8334 • E-ISSN: 1750-0176 |
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3366/para.2022.0394 |
| OpenAlex | W4284696626 |
| Language | EN |
Starting from Nicholas Zurbrugg's dismissal of the negative 'B-Effect' in postmodernism, which he associates with 'Benjamin, Brecht, Beckett, Barthes, Baudrillard, and Bourdieu', this essay examines the common rationale behind convergent affirmations of a neutrality or minimalism, often mistaken for nihilism, at key junctures in the works of Samuel Beckett and Roland Barthes, adding Maurice Blanchot as a critical link. The argument unfolds along a double axis: it first considers the formal role of 'chatter' or 'idle speech' and the fragment(ary in writing) in the three 'B-writers' before relating them to different constructions of temporality, such as the 'future anterior' and the après-coup, in their thematizations of 'catastrophe' and 'disaster' as indirect responses to personal or historical trauma and death. A brief concluding paragraph highlights how time's suspensiveness leads to different forms of waiting across Barthes, Blanchot and Beckett
Art · Epistemology · Literature · Neutrality · Nothing · Postmodernism · Psychoanalysis · Temporality · French Literature and Criticism · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology · Samuel Beckett and Modernism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|