The Opium Trade and Patterns of Terrorism in the Provinces of Afghanistan
An Empirical Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5111470 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James A Piazza (0000-0002-6557-0894, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author), James C Piazza (0000-0002-0763-4052) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 213-234 |
| Publication date | 2012-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Terrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09546553.2011.648680 |
| OpenAlex | W1965030286 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 19 |
Contemporary terrorist movements in Afghanistan are frequently alleged to be fueled, in part, by the country's voluminous opium trade. Experts argue that terrorist groups currently active in Afghanistan, like the Afghan Taliban, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, Hizbul Islami, and various al-Qaeda affiliates, use drug trade profits to recruit and pay cadres, acquire weapons and equipment, and bribe officials while becoming more powerful, and deadly, in the process. This study empirically examines the relationship between the opium trade and terrorism in Afghanistan by conducting a series of negative binomial regression estimations on terrorist attacks and casualties in the 34 Afghan provinces for the period 1996 to 2008. The analysis also considers various economic development, infrastructure, geographic, security, and cultural factors when examining causes of terrorism in the provinces. The study determines that, across all model specifications, provinces that produce more opium feature higher levels of terrorist attacks and casualties due to terrorism, and that opium production is a more robust predictor of terrorism than nearly all other province features. Furthermore, tests indicate that the direction of causation runs from opium production to higher rates of terrorism, not otherwise. The study concludes with a brief discussion of the policy implications of the findings
Afghan · Al qaeda · Backdoor · Computer security · Development economics · Economics · Negative binomial distribution · Opium · Political economy · Political science · Terrorism · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Quantitative Analysis of Factors of Terrorist Activities
Drugs Boosting Conflict? A Micro-Level Test of the Linkage Between Substance Use and Violence
Rethinking Intersections of Crime and Terrorism
Fragmented to Death
Government protection against terrorism and crime
Why do ethnopolitical organisations turn to crime
(Re)ordering’ North Waziristan, Pakistan
Drugs, law, people, place and the state
The seasonality of conflict
War, opium and economic growth in Afghanistan
Political regime and women's marriage outcomes
Fatality Thresholds, Causal Heterogeneity, and Civil War Research
How Civil Wars Help Explain Organized Crime—and How They Do Not
Insurgency and Ivory
Clarify
Where have all the flowers gone
A Subnational Study of Insurgency
Webs of Smoke
All Conflict is Local
Terrorism and democratic states
Afghanistan
The illicit drug trade, counternarcotics strategies and terrorism
A Counterradicalization Strategy for a New U.S. Administration
Narcotics, Radicalism, and Armed Conflict in Central Asia
Does Democracy Matter
The Devil You Know but Are Afraid to Face
Is Transnational Terrorism Becoming More Threatening
Incubators of Terror
Do Party Systems Count
What is New about the New Terrorism and How Dangerous is It
Structural Causes of Oppositional Political Terrorism
The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism
Reassessing the Causes of Nongovernmental Terrorism in Latin America
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,27 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |