The Study of Controversies and the Theory and History of Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5117776 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marcelo Dascal (Tel Aviv University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 147-154 |
| Publication date | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-8897 • E-ISSN: 1474-0664 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0269889700002957 |
| OpenAlex | W2160164893 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 8 |
These introductory remarks are unorthodox in many respects. The deviance from usual practice is justified by the extreme importance I attach to the subject matter of this special issue. I want to convey to the reader a sense of why I think controversies, particularly in science, are so crucial, and to propose a different way of thinking about them. This mandates, in the limited space available, a compact presentation, omitting supporting arguments and necessary elaboration - for which the reader is referred to the bibliography
Epistemology · Sociology · Subject matter · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · History of Science and Medicine · History of Science and Natural History · Philosophy
Escudriñando la razón
Reasoning and Culture in a Historical Perspective
La controverse de grotius, hobbes et spinoza sur le jus circa sacra textes, prétextes, contextes et circonstances
Scientific Controversies
Debaters’ actions to manage interaction in the context of the debate talk show
Framing interactivity in complex communication of debate talk show
Problemas da analiticidade na semântica conceitual
Théologiens, savants, érudits
Bramhall Versus Hobbes
Todos los instrumentos están en buen estado’. Disputas en torno al funcionamiento de los telescopios del Observatorio Astronómico Nacional de Chile en el siglo XIX
The Balance of Reason
Polémique et rhétorique
L’alternative française à la théorie quantitative, la théorie du revenu d’Aftalion à la lumière du débat Mendès France – Pleven
Scientists as Experts in Public Debates Characterised by Scientific Uncertainty
Priority claims and public disputes in astronomy
Les controverses scientifiques révélatrices de la nature différenciée des sciences ? Les enseignements de l'affaire Benveniste
Polemics in Public
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,81 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2026 (22) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |