Do Blasphemy Restrictions Restrict Terrorism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5119600 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lasse Skjoldager Eskildsen (University of Southern Denmark), Lasse Eskildsen (University of Southern Denmark), Christian Bjørnskov (0000-0002-9765-913X, Aarhus University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 857-869 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Terrorism and Political Violence (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0954-6553 • E-ISSN: 1556-1836 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09546553.2024.2378446 |
| OpenAlex | W4401113396 |
| Language | EN |
Although several countries have repealed their laws banning blasphemy in recent years, a majority of the world’s countries still ban some forms of blasphemous expressions. It is often argued in political debate that such legislation is necessary to prevent conflicts and terrorism. The empirical literature on the topic nevertheless remains tiny and it is an open question if blasphemy bans ‘work’ in this way. In this paper, we therefore explore the association between types of blasphemy legislation and terrorist events. We do so using a large cross-country panel dataset of up to 162 countries observed between 1970 and 2016. Exploring determinants of terrorist attacks, we find that while blasphemy legislation in general is not associated with terrorism, countries with constitutionalised blasphemy bans experience a higher terrorism risk
Blasphemy · Criminology · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Terrorism · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |