De jure powersharing 1975-2019
Updating the Inclusion, Dispersion, and Constraints Dataset
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5124329 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alix Ziff (0000-0002-3781-1208, University of Southern California), Miriam Barnum (0000-0002-2988-6648, Department of Political Science, Purdue University, USA), Ashley Abadeer (University of Southern California), Jasmine Chu (University of Southern California), Nicole Jao (University of Southern California), Marie Zaragoza (University of Southern California), Benjamin At Graham (0000-0003-0468-7535, University of Southern California, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1292-1303 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00223433241271879 |
| OpenAlex | W4404217663 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 28 |
Powersharing institutions are often prescribed to enhance civil peace, democratic survival, and the equitable provision of public services, and these institutions have become more prevalent over time. Nonetheless, the past decade has seen a rise in democratic backsliding and competitive authoritarianism, raising questions about how the relationship between powersharing, democracy, and civil peace may be evolving. This article introduces an update to the Inclusion, Dispersion, and Constraints (IDC) powersharing dataset that adds nine years of data, up through 2019. These new data include enhanced intercoder reliability checks, a significant reduction in missing values, and the documentation and correction of some coding errors in the original data. We also employ latent variable models to estimate each of three types of powersharing, allowing scholars to account for measurement uncertainty in analyses of the causes and consequences of powersharing. This dataset allows scholars to address urgent questions about whether previously observed relationships between powersharing and democracy and powersharing and civil peace still hold in this new era, and in what contexts powersharing institutions remain advisable
Data mining · Dispersion (optics) · Inclusion (mineral) · Optics · Physics · Computer Science · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology
Making Democratic Governance Work
Beyond Power Calculations
The institutional environment for infrastructure investment
Gridded global datasets for Gross Domestic Product and Human Development Index over 1990–2015
From War to Democracy
Moving the Power-Sharing Debate Forward
Updating the Militarized Interstate Dispute Data
Measuring Income Inequality Across Countries and Over Time
Constrained Concessions
Power Sharing, Protection, and Peace
Accessing the state
On Democratic Backsliding
How Much Democratic Backsliding
New Estimates of Over 500 Years of Historic GDP and Population Data
Integrating Data on Ethnicity, Geography, and Conflict
Power-sharing and the quality of democracy
Authoritarian Power Sharing
Unwelcome Change
Power Sharing
Inclusion, Dispersion, and Constraint
The Importance of Consociationalism for Twenty‐First Century Politics and Political Science
Consociational Democracy
The two faces of power-sharing
Revisiting democratic civil peace
Making Power-sharing Work
Safeguarding Democracy
Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |